| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,406 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7191 Posts |
This coin is listed as a "p" but clearly has a mint mark on the photo, any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
You gotta give us a link to what you're talkin' 'bout, my friend!  Edited by Moe145
01/20/2012 6:38 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7191 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
Yep! Definitely a mint mark on the reverse.
The 1903 S Morgan she's also offering looks suspicious to me. THAT makes me suspect this 1921 Walker. I also, am not a big fan of poor pictures that don't allow an enlarged view of the coin.
Personally, I wouldn't bid on this one.
Edited by Moe145
01/20/2012 6:49 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15428 Posts |
Appears from here to be a 1921-something MM .... but the small blurry photos do not allow for any kind of authentication. I personally would stay away.
14 day return though.
David
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.artEdited by nickelsearcher
01/20/2012 6:51 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
407 Posts |
Enlarging the pic shows the mintmark to be an "S".
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
917 Posts |
It looks to be a S to me aswell.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
For sure there is a mintmark. I would guess it is an "S" as well. The pictures are a bit small but something about this coin does not feel right but I am not sure what.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
745 Posts |
I just asked the seller....something is wrong with your 1921 p Walking Liberty half dollar, in the photo of back it has a 'S' at 7 O'clock near rim, so photo shows a 1921 S half which is worth much less $... did you guys see the feedback? SOLD = 1932 S COIN WAS COUNTERFEIT!  'I PITY THE FOOL'  that just won this 1921 S half [not p] for US $2,026.11  Edited by Penny4Me
01/20/2012 8:04 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
155 Posts |
I'd be curious what the feedback will be on this coin in the next week or so.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
Quote:
O'clock near rim, so photo shows a 1921 S half which is worth much less $...
did you guys see the feedback? Actually, in xf, the 21s is WAY more valuable. Let's review: - Bad pix and description
- Not certified
- FB for counterfoot coin
- Multiple high-value, virtually no common coins sold
Possibility of fake? About 106%. |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
I agree with Fred. In higher grades, the 1921-s is probably the most valuable walker there is. I also agree the coin looks "off" fo me. More than likely a counterfeit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
The S mintmark on early-date San Francisco walkers is pretty small. Starting with the 1927-S they started with a larger size, more like what shows in the ebay photo. Just one more indication the authenticity is iffy. Here's the reverse of my 1921-S (much lower grade, unfortunately!):  |
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,406 |
|
Posted 01/20/2012 6:41 pm
