| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,063 |
|
Valued Member
United States
132 Posts |
Slabbed PCGS 1881-s morgan. Since discovering this forum, particularly the grading subsection, it has been extremely beneficial for honing my grading skills. Why not pay back the favor? Take your best shot!  
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
361 Posts |
OK, I'll try first. I will say MS64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
Very nice...some of the marks are a bit distracting IMO. So...MS62?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1659 Posts |
I'll take a stab at it. MS64
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
I'll have to go with MS62 maybe MS63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
MS-64
They may have given it a 65, if they were feeling generous that day.
Edited by Canadian-Banknotes 03/13/2012 12:05 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
172 Posts |
MS65 is my guess. Lightly toned, very few contact marks, none of them in prime focal areas (nose, eyes, etc...).
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
These are scans, which kinda throw one's perceptions off when evaluating for grade. On a scan, "dark" tends to be "bright" in-hand, and vice versa. Unfortunately, "color" tends to be "dark," also.  So, the color on the lower obverse could be fairly lustrous in-hand, but not seen here. The rest of the obverse field isn't terrifically bright, but the reverse is, especially down the center. Further, the orientation of the coin to the direction in which the scanner's light passes can have an effect; this one was oriented nice and square I think, as if it were being photographed correctly. With most scanners, that makes the coin appear as if it were lit from 6:00. Now, here's how that plays on the cheek, where we first look when grading a Morgan: The darker spots, especially below the eye, are likely less-consequential. They're almost certainly just luster breaks. It's the things that look "bright" on the scan that interest us; they're features which are deep enough to reflect back into the scanner sensor. Of those, there are darn few. Extending our view out into the fields, we see an equal scarcity of individual "marks" of either dark or light flavor - indeed, there's virtually nothing to draw the eye there. Now, understanding that these images are rather too small to form conclusive opinion....I wouldn't be surprised to see this one in an MS66 slab. The single-worst mark I see is at the hairline, right behind the eye - I think its' directional orientation to the scanner light masks it's depth.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3345 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
132 Posts |
Dave, I'm opposed to scanned coins as well, but the scanner actually worked better then my really good point and shoot. I've taken a liking to taking pictures outside in the sun, but it was cloudy yesterday.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
My first instinct was MS63 but after reading the post by SuperDave I'll amend my guess to MS64. I'm probably not the only one who would like to see a photograph for comparison.
I think the more important skill is to be able to evaluate coins at auction with scans rather than photographs.
Edited by dave700x 03/13/2012 12:59 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
132 Posts |
Its sunny here so far today, when I get home I'll work on uploading some fresh pics.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: I think the more important skill is to be able to evaluate coins at auction with scans rather than photographs. In this day and age when so much potential business is available online only, it behooves us as collectors to incorporate the evaluation of all types of online imaging into our skillsets. That's an ongoing process for everyone - even though I've been doing this for quite a while I'm always ready to change my opinion of what I'm seeing based on new evidence. Question everything, most importantly yourself.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I will guess MS-64 with a possibility of MS-65.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
132 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
I must be seeing more hits on the cheek than the others, I'm going MS62 maybe a 63, hopefully it's not as poorly graded as my 1921 ANACS, I put up a couple of months ago. https://goccf.com/t/108179I got robbed on that one!
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
Edited by westcoin 03/14/2012 02:46 am
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,063 |