1921 Broadstrike Morgan

Lets see, heres 2 more images but I do not have side shots.

http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/...nt001jc7.jpg

http://img307.imageshack.us/img307/...nt005nv8.jpg

Best side shot I got, sorry the coin is not in my house:

http://img307.imageshack.us/img307/...nt002tv0.jpg

http://img307.imageshack.us/img307/...nt007hn8.jpg

In all honesty, this coin doesn't look a heck of a lot different than any of my 1921's - the "slant" you speak of, bigchuck, is present to a greater or lesser degree on all of them. The rim seems even all around the coin; this would indicate that the collar was in place when it was struck, so a broadstrike or partial collar strike is out of the question. However, the pictures aren't clear enough to make me absolutely sure that the collar was perfectly fitted around the coin when it was struck; if the "slant" isn't even all the way around, it could have been the result of a discrepancy in the strike of some sort. Unfortunately, not an important-enough discrepancy to change the value of the coin.

The cloth imprint comes from exactly what the coin is doing in your pictures: sitting on cloth. Had it been struck through cloth, individual threads would have been impressed into the surface of the coin, and the surface would have actual indentations from it.

It's a normal Morgan dollar - no error.

A broadstruck coin is struck out of collar. With reeded edge coins, this would mean that not only would the coin have to be larged in diameter than a normal coin, but it also wouldn't have any reeding since this part of the coin is provided by the collar. Since this coin has reeding, it had to be struck in-collar, thus is not a broadstrike.