Thanks for the warm welcome and that very interesting article by Triton. Those forgeries are very impressive indeed !
In my case its just a sample of 1922 British mainly ( maybe 33% of my collection ) with just one 1921 so thats baffling. It could be that there was a batch say Dec 1921 to April 1922 where there were ferro impurities which caused the paramanetism. I dont know... I dont understand why this same Neo magnet doesn't affect modern Cupronickel coins with very high content. Maybe I will get an even stronger magnet and experiment.. or take the coins to the local coin shop who might be able to give an opinion.
In my case its just a sample of 1922 British mainly ( maybe 33% of my collection ) with just one 1921 so thats baffling. It could be that there was a batch say Dec 1921 to April 1922 where there were ferro impurities which caused the paramanetism. I dont know... I dont understand why this same Neo magnet doesn't affect modern Cupronickel coins with very high content. Maybe I will get an even stronger magnet and experiment.. or take the coins to the local coin shop who might be able to give an opinion.




















