Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1922 Silver Coins With Neodynium Magnet

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 4,032Next Topic  
New Member

United Kingdom
2 Posts
 Posted 04/11/2012  10:26 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add AGjunky to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I normally test my pre-1947 silver coins with a pretty strong ferrous magnet. I have never seen one that attracts compared to some modern bronze coins which jump onto the magnet. However I recently picked up a tiny rare earth Neo magnet from Maplins, really small 3mm by 2mm and weighs practically nothing. They are darn powerful. If I push a coin next to it on a smooth surface, the slightest attraction can drag the magnet or if stronger causes the magnet to jump onto the coin. I tested all of my pre-1947 silver coins out of curiosity and I am finding quite a few which do have a weak attraction and strangely they are nearly all 1922 dated. Mainly florins and Shillings. Seen one Half crown dated 1921. Nothing smaller than shilling. A normal magnet has no attraction at all to these. However I have other 1922 and 1921 coins which don't attract. At first I thought they were fake, but visually, size and weight they are OK I think. They ring pretty similar too when struck. 1922 is just too big a coincidence ? My research suggests there was 10% nickel content in the early 1920-1922s coins, then just silver/copper, then silver/copper/nickel/zinc with 5% nickel after 1928. Nickel is magnetic of course.

Anyone else tried this or have an explanation for it. Maybe they are contemporary forgeries and 1922/1921 just so happened to be a big years ? Or the 10% nickel in these years is large enough to get picked by these extremely powerful tiny Neo Mags ? Then again modern CupronNIckel coins with 25% nickel dont attract the magnet. Strange.
Moderator
Learn More...
Sap's Avatar
Australia
16873 Posts
 Posted 04/11/2012  8:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hello and welcome to the forum.

Extra-super-powerful magnets can cause some strange interactions with materials that aren't normally considered "magnetic".

From a technical point of view, all substances are "magnetic" - either ferromagnetic (they have their own magnetic field), paramagnetic (they are attracted to a magnetic field) or diamagnetic (they are repulsed by a magnetic field).

Diamagnetism is usually too weak to see any real-world effects, but modern neodymium/rare earth magnets can easily demonstrate it with a solid metallic object like a coin. So a "usually non-magnetic" coin is just as likely to try to push away from a neo magnet than it is to be attracted to one.

If it is paramagneism rather than diamagnetism that you're seeing, it could indeed be increased nickel content causing the alloy of the coin to become slightly paramagnetic. But I would expect to see a similar effect for all .500 fine 1920-1922 coins.

As for the possibility of it being counterfeit, it's always possible. I don't know about British coins, but I know the 1920s and 1930s was a notorious time for fake Australian silver coins. There was apparently a big Hong Kong / Chinese criminal gang doing counterfeiting back then. Triton's article.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
New Member
United Kingdom
2 Posts
 Posted 04/12/2012  05:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add AGjunky to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the warm welcome and that very interesting article by Triton. Those forgeries are very impressive indeed !

In my case its just a sample of 1922 British mainly ( maybe 33% of my collection ) with just one 1921 so thats baffling. It could be that there was a batch say Dec 1921 to April 1922 where there were ferro impurities which caused the paramanetism. I dont know... I dont understand why this same Neo magnet doesn't affect modern Cupronickel coins with very high content. Maybe I will get an even stronger magnet and experiment.. or take the coins to the local coin shop who might be able to give an opinion.
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1324 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2012  2:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add andyg to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nothing much to worry about - it took the mint a few years of adjustments to the metal in the early 20's to find one suitable.
1920 (silver reduced to 50%) rest containing a copper based alloy.
1922 change to a straight 1:1 silver copper mix
1927 switch to silver (50%) copper nickel zinc alloy.
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 4,032Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to rattle this change. Forums