| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,754 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
54 Posts |
Hi. I was just reviewing some of my collection. And noticed an odd thing. I have three sets of the 2010 Olympic quarters with the dollars. These are the ones with the hard cardboard case that is 11-sided like a loonie. Anyway, one of the three sets has two quarters that are the same. In other words, a packaging error. Are these kinds of errors worth anything? Have other people seen these types of errors (specifically this one, or other similar kinds)?
Thanks, Mishkin.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
677 Posts |
Yes packing errors are considered worth a premium. I have seen a few different kinds but am not up to date with the current price on them. I have heard some might be worth $100. Isn't collecting fun?
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
54 Posts |
Cool! I don't plan on selling, but it's neat to find something like this.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2408 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
54 Posts |
Here are the images!  So the first ones are of the "normal" set:   This is the set with the packaging error:   The sets are otherwise in good condition, have the hologram on the back, and, since they were purchased from the same place, have sequence numbers on them that are _very_ close together.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
54 Posts |
Does anyone else have this set that can check if the error is common?
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12272 Posts |
A word of caution here...
While some packaging errors can be worth a premium (often minor), they are usually the type that had to occur within the Mint and not once the package left the Mint. For example, the wrong mix of coins in a RCM-sealed Uncirculated Set.
But when there is easy access to the coins, such as in a Collector Card like you've presented, who is to say that one or more coins weren't swapped out to make an "error" set. Coins can be carefully removed and replaced in these cards, so savvy collectors would be very cautious about purported error sets.
I'm not saying that's the case with yours, but it is for this reason that many collectors are skeptical and wouldn't pay a premium.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems 04/30/2012 11:05 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
54 Posts |
Hmm. The coins are actually sealed with some sort of plastic on both sides - it is a pre-populated collector card. Not sure if it is done at the mint, but certainly it's not just a matter of popping out the coin and replacing it. I can't touch the metal surface of any of the coins. I'm pretty sure this is a legitimate packaging error due to the type of sealing used. I don't know what to call it technically, but it is like a single piece of laminate that is bonded to the cardboard on both sides. Taking it off to substitute a coin should be just as hard as fabricating a fake uncirculated set.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
178 Posts |
I have this same set, which came directly from the mint. And like mberteig says, there is plastic covering both sides of the coin. I'm not sure how you could tamper with the packaging without it being obvious. Now I have to check and see if all the coins are different in mine when I get home!
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
54 Posts |
Hi thehulk, let us know if it has the error! It would be cool to find out how many of there there are and how many have packaging errors. Personally, I would be thrilled to have a unique or close-to-unique item even if it isn't worth much.
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12272 Posts |
I apologize, I do not own the set under discussion and could not tell from the images presented that it was sealed in plastic on both sides. My comments were directed to unsealed sets that I have come across in the past that were purported to have an error of some sort -- I thought this set was similar.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
54 Posts |
Hi commems, no problem! I appreciate the word of caution as it made me go back and check just to make sure.
I'm not planning to sell it, but I do wonder if this is the sort of error that anyone cares about. Prior to joining this forum a few weeks ago, I didn't even know that _anyone_ cared about errors :-). I've since gone back through my "stash" and found a few minor errors (slightly rotated die, plating error, and a biggish die chip) on circulation coins, but this one seems like a bigger error since it is non-circulation. Any thoughts on value / desirability of this sort of packaging error would be welcome feedback.
Thanks, Mishkin
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,754 |
|