| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,696 |
|
Valued Member
United States
368 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
I'll go first... VF35
Edit: changed my mind (before any grades posted)
Edited by donkrx
06/06/2012 8:00 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
153 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
368 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3234 Posts |
Assuming they thought it was MS....MS61.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15425 Posts |
NGC XF40.
No way this is an MS coin ...
David
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I will also go with EF-40.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
368 Posts |
Personally, I think it's overgraded.....I'm trying to decide whether to crack it open for my album or send it back. I'll post the grade a little later tonight.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1388 Posts |
GradeGradeGradeGradeGradeGrade!'
Tell us- Au- 50
|
|
Valued Member
United States
368 Posts |
Overgraded maybe? AU55  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
AU55 hmm.... I guess a weak strike? I was going back and forth because I wasn't sure how much of it was wear and how much of it was just a weak strike. But the luster seems pretty decent so it couldn't be very much wear I guess.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1590 Posts |
The obverse looks much more "mushier" than the reverse. However; there is still feather detail on the reverse. XF requires 60 percent of the feather detail to be present. This has all the feather detail present.....just soft. So it has to be AU and a really, really soft strike. Something Frisco was known for during the Peace dollar days. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
hard to tell from a pic but it might just have enough to bump it from xf45 to an au50
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
Thanks for the response jmkendall  . And yeah, I actually read about the weak strikes for S mint after making my guess (originally I thought that problem was specific to a particular series, not everything from the S mint). I can see the feathers being the first detail to fade with wear, and therefore a coin with 100% feather detail is probably AU, but I'm surprised that you say "it has to be AU" because of this fact. Can't it be possible that the obverse wears faster than the reverse? Either way I should have realized the feather detail was the key. I did notice that the feather wear was the most consistent detail but I just didn't think anything of it because I was so focused on whether the obverse was a very weak strike or wear. Interesting coin to grade, thanks for posting it. Are you going to crack it out? |
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,696 |
Posted 06/06/2012 7:39 pm
