| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 3,188 |
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
Hi there, There have been questions and suspicion arisen on a NGC graded coin set, and pardon my ignorance, I'd like to ask for your expertise over it here. Your help is greatly appreciated! The questions are on the ANA laser label on the back of the slabs, which are concerned because: - The label is smaller and obscurer comparing to the newer version of NGC laser labelling
- the edges are not evenly cut and images are often off centered
- the non uniform corner cuts of the labels are apparent
- if I look at it, it does give you the sense of counterfeit - in a bad way - comparing to the newer version of larger laser labels
Could you please view the images and share your thoughts and insights? Much appreciated! 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
787 Posts |
Sjin, My former job partially dealt with highly valuable serialized COAs (Certificates of Authenticity) for a few high name companies. This being said, I am not an expert in this area. Yet, I am fairly sure that stickers for a prestigious organization like ANA are not likely to be off center. They are not likely to be blurred, and the edges are not likely to be anything short of perfect. I would think their QA department would reject any stickers not being up to par. You may also note that a lot of counterfeits are coming out of China from what I understand. I would contact the ANA directly and get their take on this.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
614 Posts |
 with above. also, this is of topic but you don't happen to be skin from the yogscast do you?
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
Thank you very much for the replies. You seem to confirm my suspicion. It was bought from ebay, and paid through Paypal. If it comes to the worst, then I assume it can be disputed through ebay and paypal. Does anyone have experience over that process? TIA!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Not an expert either but agreed ANA labels would always look professional barring an error. I would confirm or deny its real as fast as possible. I believe when you dispute the charge if they have available pay pal funds they take it from there but if not you can be out of luck. Did the seller have a return policy? If so I would just return it and be done with it
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
What matters is the actual pattern on the sticker, not the shape of the sticker border or the centering of the image. I am positive it is certainly possible the images on the sticker could be off center depending on the cutting process of the labels (like if they were being fed through too fast). I don't see anything wrong with the edges other than some superficial chipping which could just be the sticker getting old and suffering wear. And realize that if a counterfeiter is gonna have problems its not gonna be in centering the image or cutting it evenly (thats easy) ... its gonna be getting the design of the image correct. Now just to put my money where my mouth is I went to check my older NGC slab which holds a completely genuine Barber dime. It too is significantly off center and looks exactly like these in the picture... the edges are not perfectly straight (they have a VERY slight arc, almost unnoticeable), if that's what you were saying. However the image detail matches yours, and yours match to each other. (I cant get a pic right now I can tomorrow if you must see it though) And remember this isn't just about the fancy little sticker... a sticker is just one counterfeit prevention tool, take a look at the slab itself (if not also the coin lol). If its fake chances are you'd notice something after looking somewhat closely at it. Counterfeit slabs depend on you not thinking to check the slab itself so I'm betting you'd be able to see problems.
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
Sorry for my late response. The set is a 2000 Gold Eagle mint set.
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
Thank you all so much for the explanation and insights! Especially to donkrx for your expertise!
I know that ppl told me that the the older version NGC hologram labels are of lower quality than the new version introduced in 2006(? I think). And I agree with most of your points.
Since you mentioned the importance of examination of the coin and slab, and I do have concerns on the sets I got. At first, AFAIK, the gold coated quality counterfeit are almost as good as the commercial strikes that US Mint issues - at least to my eyes. Secondly, on 2 of the slabs the NGC grade labels are peeled and bulging at the center, which I have not seen before - again to my limited knowledge. Thirdly, the dash sign in the barcode numbers is not slanted, rather just a straight '-'. But on the slab themselves, they do look ok - no apparent signs as mentioned on the NGC alert notice.
I will upload complete pictures of the slabs tonight.
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
|
|
New Member
China
7 Posts |
Hello, the label is ture or fake? I got a coin with this kind of label too.
|
|
New Member
China
7 Posts |
oh, I found it ,it's ngc label used between 1997 and 2000.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
First these are not ANA holograms, they are NGC holograms. The label and hologram type shown in the whole slab picture by sjin were used from July 2001 to July of 2003. There are at least two possibly three different sizes of this hologram. NGC 7 and 8 used a large version of the hologram. When the front label reverted to the same as on NGC 7 it switched to a smaller size hologram. (When the slab book was published the slab shown as NGC 7 should have come between NGC 8 and 9. At that time I did not realize the difference between it and NGC 7.) The other possibility is that NGC 7 had a small hologram, NGC 8 and NGC 8.5 had a large holograms, and the the went back to the small hologram for NGC 9. I need to do some searching through some State Quarters and/or silver eagles and determine the exact order. The holograms are printed in layers of plastic on a paper backing and then the paper is run through a die cut machine that cuts the film but not the paper. If the paper is not properly positioned the resulting holograms can be off-center, at an angle, or even running off the edge with part of the image missing. Nornally you would expect defective holograms to be rejected, but how bad does the defect have to be? And in some cases I would still expect the occasional error to slip through.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 3,188 |
|