| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 3,094 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
9416 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1295 Posts |
Is there a depression across that whole area?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
9416 Posts |
Markn, yes that part of the coin has a depression between the '0' and the Queens neck. Steve   
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
652 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
Looks like a grease blob on the die. Very common on US quarter dollars. If the planchet were at fault there should be a corresponding weak spot on the opposite face of the coin.
Edited by swamperbob 02/27/2007 9:39 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
9416 Posts |
Yass, thanks for the pictures. Swamperbob, the reverse side is perfect. Steve   
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
Yass Those also appear to me made from greased dies.
triggersmob The fact that the area opposite the missing detail is complete "seals the deal". You need to think of the strike in terms of how pressure transfers a feature from die to planchet. A defective (tapered or thin planchet) causes a loss of detail because there is not enough metal available to fill the die. A failure to fill on one side REQUIRES that the same effect happens on the opposite side of the planchet. The designs "come up" on the opposite sides at the same instance and one side can not come fully up while the other does not. The grease (which is very hard old grease filled with metal dust) fills and clings to the die. This "fill" provides the resistance that allows strike pressure to develope uniformly over the entire surface.
Now there are other possibilites that could make a similar impression but they all involve strikes made through various forms of debris.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
652 Posts |
Thanks Swamperbob. While not all that common on our coins, they do look terrfific if you can get them while there still uncirculated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
9416 Posts |
Thank you for your replies. Steve   
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
I agree they can be very nice in MS. I have a pair of US quarters dated 1996 that I got from a Bank roll that have the identical grease spot - and the second still has a small bit of the black grease attached. I put it in a 2x2 with the grease in place.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1767 Posts |
swamperbob...quote: and the second still has a small bit of the black grease attached. I put it in a 2x2 with the grease in place.
I am a bit confused on this 'grease' thing can you post a pic so I can see what you are referring to? teach me, show me, I want to learn. Thanks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
Hi Mila_cent - the pictures on this thread show the loss of detail caused by grease clinging to the die. I don't have a picture of my coin with the grease - but even if I did - it would look like a dirty coin with a black spot where the missing detail is located. The grease is harder than you would normally expect. It is old grease that has stiffened by the addition of dust, dirt and metal powder that results from the wear of the metal components of the press. This old grease simply falls into the coining chamber and sticks to the die for a while. Eventually, it gets spotted by a mint worker who can stop the press and brush the die with a wire brush. At times, they also simply fall off. But while it remains unnoticed - the grease fills in a portion of the die and the coin metal can not push into the space occupied by the grease. That may sound impossible - because everyone "knows" that grease is softer than metal. But the problem here is the speed of the strike and the fact that in a closed coining chamber - the grease has absolutely no place to move to. It can't be compressed enough to transmit the complete design - so the best you get is a ghost image of part of the design. If you have ever seen a "dropped letter" error, they are caused by this same grease material. There is one shown in this weeks edition of Coin World. I hope that helps.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
161 Posts |
Yes is struck thru grease and looks to be the same as a few 2006 roo $1 ive seen.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 3,094 |
|