| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,891 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7190 Posts |
I now have a Dansco 7070 purchased at a local coin shop in the new city I have moved to. I have most of the coins in various shape and I have resurrected some 2x2 stapled holders I have has since I was a kid and have been merely filling the spots. Now the dilemma, should I take high quality coins from other sets thus leaving holes in them or start a search for new additions to my type set? I have been stuck in my collection to high cost items for set completions, now I can start new searches for type coins I have not focused on since I was young. So many types of minor coins that require upgrading and how do I choose only one modern commemorative dollar? I was thinking of putting this set in for the Kennedy silver and the commemorative dollar.  
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36741 Posts |
My 7070 type set comes before all other sets. I use the best examples I have for that set with everything else going to the date sets. But that's just me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
642 Posts |
I'm with IndainGoldEagle, My best examples go to the 7070.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
I find myself putting my better coins in my type set. Of course you can always move a coin back to your regular sets if a different set comes along.
I really like the 1998 S matte proof coin .. I might have to do the same thing, putting one in the silver kennedy hole.
As for the commemorative dollar it is very hard to choose, right now I have a Jefferson UNC. I choose the Jefferson becuase I am trying for all president coins for my commerative slots .. Half dollars Washington, Madison, Lincoln and Grant then Jefferson for the dollar.
Again what ever you choose .. you can always change it later.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Its all personal preference.
Personally I like to keep my best coins together. I have a bunch of type sets going and keep my best ones in the 19th and 20th century main type set and then use the not as good ones for the individual types sets I have going like the penny, dime, quarter ect
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7190 Posts |
So for my walking liberty should I crack out the proof  Or take this from the date set? 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Muddler thats a hard call. I do crack out slabs for my type set but I dont get real high end ones either. I try and stay in the low MS grades as I could never personally crack out a coin worth hundreds of dollars. Depending on how much the slab one is worth, I know they seem to be expensive on ebay at the moment if I remember correctly, I might go with the 1916 or look for a middle ground between the two and keep the slab one in the slab. But like has been said before its all up to you. If you have a slabbed collection as well I wouldnt break that up for the album
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
Wow! Wish I had that problem! Personally I would go with the 1916. Not because I am opposed to cracking that slob...but first yearr in that condition trumps the proof IMO.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
That is a hard call .. I feel I would go with the 1916 D.
There was a thread a while back where the op broke out a lot of high dollar slabbed coins. He later decided to sell the set .. and had the coins set back in for grading, most of them came back with lower grades and he lost a lot of money.
Also, in my experience, proof coins do not hold up as well in albums. The proofs can get paper dust on them, which can develop into spots. They can also be damaged easier from the slides going across them.
That 1916 D is a very hot looking coin that I would love to have in my collection.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
I put a 42 proof Jefferson In mine and it developed a haze.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1432 Posts |
The proof is tooooooo nice to crack out.  The 16-D definitely belongs in your date set. Option 3: According to Numismedia, the cost for a Walking Liberty type in MS-60 is $32. Small price to leave your slab unmolested and keep your date set as-is. BTW, what grade is on the slab?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
I'm with basebal21. If I need two of the same coin, the better one goes into the regular album. But if I had some really nice Seated Liberty dollars that magically showed up in my Type Set album I would go the other way. I try not to crack open cases too often. It's like throwing money away.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7190 Posts |
There remains my dilemma, do I go with key dates and leave holes in my date mint sets or go with a well struck non proof example to show the design.
Jeffrose, PCGS PR 64 walker.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
561 Posts |
Personally, I would think that the 7070 would be better suited for the best looking non-proof example I could find to put into the set. I imagine if/when I do mine I would be looking for the most common higher grade examples to put in the 7070 because I want to eventually work on sets of the other series.
I can certainly see the side that wants to add the key dates to the 7070 and if I didn't have a desire to collect a set of the series I would probably be in this camp as well.
At the end of the day I don't think you can go wrong either way.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Regardless of whese you put a coin, as far as my opinion, no coin belongs inside a plastic slab. I collect coins, not plastic.
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
my uncle had a type folder 40 -50 years ago that got me interested in coins. if dansco was making the 7070 that far back, that's the one he had. one christmas I got him a philly vdb cent for an open slot, only a buck or 2 at local show, and it made me proud to be able to fill a slot in his amazing book. move ahead 45 years and I'm buying my own 7070. My childhood collection was the source of the first 15 to 20 slots. Over the next few years I filled up the book via coin shows, ebay and my local coin shop with everything from proofs to sure fire body baggers - even cracked a fair amount of slabs......common theme was not grade or eye appeal, but rather cost of acquiring..... then reacquiring as I upgraded earlier purchases. I started removing coins from my 7070 about a year ago and putting into 2x2's and then in bank vault - not so much because of their value but because of how much it would hurt if something happened to them. I miss looking at the book but have nice photo archive and a new plan for the empty 7070. that is to fill it back up with coins that didn't make the final cut of the first "edition". I'm thinking this will give me a 7070 set I can see and show the grandkids and another set safe and sound. better still, it will give me some new blank spots to fill.
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,891 |