| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,626 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
972 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1431 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I would say a bit below 65 because of the scuff marks in the obv. field, but it is a really top condition anyway. Nicely struck. MS63 or 4. Way better than any of mine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
I think ICCS would grade it ms62 or ms63.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
Great coin but not sure how much the strike weakness in the crown and shield will hurt the grade.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
419 Posts |
Wow, that is a nice coin!!!
Alex
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
The little toning on the reverse takes away from eye appeal,the little dings don't help either but, still very nice coin.  MS-62
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
My ICCS MS63 doesn't have this cameo on the obverse--nice! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9866 Posts |
Nice coin! MS64,weakness of the reverse is typical.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
Probably MS63. Looks like it has been dipped and is starting to retone. Very hard to judge the lustre (or lack thereof) in pictures of these kinds of pieces.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
902 Posts |
I'll have to go with MS-64 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
972 Posts |
Thank-you all for your opinions, much appreciated. I have had this coin since 1986 and will be sending it to ICCS for grading soon. I will post a picture of the flip when I get it back to share the results. I personally grade it as a MS63 and possibly a MS64. It may be one obverse mark too many for MS64. Also one grade point can be considerable difference in value. Also was impressed with the quality of grading from CCF members as the opinions given were close and not all over the map.  The coin is a original coin and never dipped or cleaned. Thanks again for your opinions. 
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,626 |
|