| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,954 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
729 Posts |
I'm on the prowl for a Trade dollar, and know they're vastly counterfeited... found these two, and am curious what you ppl think...and why you think the way you do. Pictures supplied be potential sellers. thanks    
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36841 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
729 Posts |
what am I supposed to look for in spotting a fake Trade dollar?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
55 Posts |
When it comes to Trade dollars, its better to just buy one slabbed.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
55 Posts |
Also, fakes will usually be magnetic, and weigh different than actual Trade dollars, so take a magnet and scale along with you when looking for one. Sometimes, if you seen enough examples, you can tell that a coin has been poured into a cast, rather than stuck.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36841 Posts |
epikur the best defense is to know what the genuine coin is suppose to look like. Look at many genuine coins, get use to what the correct color should be, details, weight, and remember used silver coins have a distinctive odor. If you want one now without taking the time to learn, buy a certified coin by one of USA top grading companies. Compare the details of your two coins to those in these photos of a genuine coin.  
Edited by IndianGoldEagle 08/16/2012 1:17 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I agree, both are not real. Both have mushy details and the surface looks very grainy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
642 Posts |
On the first one, the eagle's proportion just doesn't look right. Surface looks much too porous for a Silver coin. The denticles on the obverse look too soft around ten o'clock as do the olive branch details, almost like the die was too shallow for the coin.
The second one is much worse on soft details. Porous surfaces, odd die issue around the top of the obverse. The die details about Liberty's head almost looks like it wasn't all the way attached to the body on the die.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
OK. First coin: Aside the color, the reverse is relatively convincing. Strike is good, denticles are sharp, and only the tail area immediately above 900 draws attention. But, to a knowledgeable collector, that's attention enough to disqualify it. The obverse is far more clear on the issue. It has the classic mushiness of the fakes, especially on the periphery. The first place to look on the obverse is the branch in Liberty's hand, and this one's a smoking-gun giveaway with its' weakness. That's always a difficult place for the counterfeiters to get right. The overall color is classic "off-metal fake". Note the obvious areas of green corrosion on the obverse - I don't see a righteous Trade dollar doing that. They have too much relief to be PVC infection, considering the small area they cover. I own an off-metal Seated dollar with similar corrosion, which has developed during the 5 years I've owned it. And look at the bagmark in the northwest field. This one traded as genuine for much of its' life. Given that it was acquired for a Dollar's worth of value, and liquidated for a Dollar's worth of value, in that sense for a while it was genuine. The second one requires no such in-depth study. Its' overall mushiness is an instant disqualification. At least they got the branch right, but the adjacent neck just blows it out of the water.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
all fake I bet. be safe and buy one in NGC, PCGS or ANACs slabs
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
729 Posts |
Thanks for all your input...SsuperDdave, that was just the sort of info I needed
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
Yeah, that first one is a decent fake as it would pass muster for anyone not overly familiar with the coin. That second one is just awful.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
If there is one single generality you can apply to determining the authenticity of a Major like Trade dollars and Morgans, it's consistency. These were struck with superior technology, and very high quality control, and wore evenly. With a coin that large, inconsistent details were much harder to hide than with smaller coins. Don't look at just one aspect - compare all details and fields to each other. If they don't seem consistent to you - each matching the strike quality and wear rate of the others - the red flag is raised until you convince yourself otherwise. Unfortunately, the quality of the counterfeits are steadily increasing, and the newer ones (last few years) are difficult indeed.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2224 Posts |
I know little about Trade dollars, but I saw the post and thought I'd "play" to see how I would do. I thought the first was real, and instantly knew the second one wasn't. Fooled me! Take the advice of those here; buy one from a reputable TPG. There are just way too many fakes of these.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I could tell both of those were fake if all you had supplied was the Obverse pictures. That second one is not even a good fake it is pretty close to the worst looking copy I believe I have ever seen. I don't remember ever seeing ones neck look like that before. There is missing details all over the Obverse and Reverse of that coin
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,954 |