I agree, and as a Canon user, The M42 makes use of most enlarging lenses...Personally, I have the Canon FL bellows, Very well built, stable and with very fine adjustments. The only other bellows I would consider is the vivitar M42 bellows due to these same points....One of the main considerations I was looking for with a bellows is the ability to mount other lenses up to 135mm. I like the canon due to one adapter allows (M42 to Canon) all screw mounts to be used(with a step down ring)
as well as ease of mounting just about any other type lens to it.. this is due to the fact that I may not find the same lens cheap with M42 as they can be a bit more expensive, but they can be found in Canon C/FD mounts or very easily adaptable to most lens mounts, with an easily cheaply priced adapter...
My main concern was to "have" say
2 or 3 at max adaptable platforms.....M42 with rings allows Tokina M40 or all M39 "all makes" lenses, with the C/FD with an adapter say a Nikon, it pretty much lets me choose any lens I may be interested in, with 3 main mountings, Canon, Nikon or M42/39...Of which I can find a cheap price for the lens I may be interested in...This is due to the fact, say, early Pentax was M42, and many an Ebayer asks high prices for older Pentax named lenses,,,as well as named lenses despite that they are the same cheaper priced known lens listed under different mounts...
This does give you an wonderful advantage of buying a great lenses at a great prices

when you have the ability to use more than one mount....