Let me start by saying that it is my understanding (perhaps inaccurate) that the
RCM's quality control is much better than that of the US Mint. Having said that, I have been disappointed with the quality of my War of 1812 Silver Proof set and War of 1812 Gold Coin.
With the former, there is a roughly 2 mm long lint mark of some kind just in the front field of the beaver's face on the nickel. The dime has a 'tick mark' of some kind on the front left field of the obverse. Finally, the reverse of the penny has what looks to be a bag mark on the left field (I didn't think it was possible to have a bag mark on a proof coin, but it sure looks like one?). Since the issue is sold out, my only options are to keep the set despite its flaws or receive a refund.
With my War of 1812 gold coin, I already returned it once for exchange because it had two light scratches on the obverse field. The replacement coin I received has a lint mark just above the dates. I am leery of returning for an exchange again, because there is always the chance the package will be lost/stolen. And I have tempted fate once already. Plus, I may receive yet another flawed coin even if I do:(
Anyway, the point of my long-winded post is to get some input from other more seasoned collectors as to whether it is possible to enjoy one's NCLT coins even though they have the types of flaws that I describe. Am I being too picky and unrealistic in expecting the coins I receive to be 'perfect'/free of these manufacturing flaws? Maybe there really is no such thing as a perfect coin (existence of grade 'MS-70' notwithstanding).
I guess that I'm a bit depressed, because I thought that by buying
RCM NCLT coins, I would avoid the quality control problems evident in some of the coins I have bought from my country's mint. I guess I was being naive in expecting this. Thanks for reading my ramble and for sharing your thoughts on this. I hope to make my peace with my coins' shortcomings and to derive some enjoyment from owning them.