| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 1,334 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
VF30 from what can be seen.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19966 Posts |
F12, questionable surfaces and authenticity. The MM looks off to me.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
131 Posts |
F-12 here also. Also not sure about that mint mark, it looks too far over to the left of the date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1193 Posts |
I thought the mm looked suspicious too. Then compared to my first 14-D it looks very similar. I'm going to re photograph it for you guys in a little bit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
Ok here is my original 14-D:  And here is a better photo of the new 14-D:  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19966 Posts |
I like the "original" one 10x better!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
Thanks Thad! Me too I think.
One has to go lol
|
|
Valued Member
United States
163 Posts |
vf20. good wheat lines; separated cheek/jaw; good details in hair.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Yes, your original one is lower grade but has better color and a better strike. The second one is a below average strike with unattractive color, I'd let it go for sure.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
I'm hardly an expert on LWCs, so I cobbled together some certified coins with the OP coin. Is it just my eyes, but does the vertical stroke of the "D" look bent to the left?   Edited by DVCollector
09/05/2012 5:11 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19966 Posts |
The top of the entire D seems to be slanted left. That's why I didn't like it. The OP pics are too small to tell much about the MM.
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
The shape of the mintmark opening is one of the diagnostics for a genuine 1914-D, it should be a sideways isosceles triangular. Even if your coin is completely genuine, a damaged mintmark on a 1914-D is a bit of a sticky wicket and will only create resale problems in the future if it is kept raw.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
I'm thinking F-15.
Definitely needs to be verified if you plan to sell it (IMO)
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,334 |
|
Posted 09/05/2012 06:02 am
