| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,038 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
Wow, hard for me to say, but I think maybe AU50/53. Just an opinion though. The strike is strong but there is definately wear on the highest point of the coin. Looks a lot like one I own.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
Au50-53 if its not cleaned
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
620 Posts |
EF-45 nice addition to your collection
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts |
AU50. She's missing bounce on the surface, poor girl; unless it's just the pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2077 Posts |
Detail on the reverse is amazing. Why did they stop that in 1922?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Quite a bit of wear on this coin. Surfaces are shiny but have no luster.
I can't really go higher than EF-40 details on this one
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
It looks like a EF-45 but coin may have been cleaned.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
 EF45
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
397 Posts |
Personally, I think it's around XF45 or so.
The relief on this coin is good, however I've got a few non 1921s that are even better. It's amazing how much it can vary in this set.
I don't think I did too bad on this '21 @ $50 :)
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
I thought only F or VF, but its a 1921, so maybe high VF. No higher, though. Looks polished too : (
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,038 |
|