| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,820 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
746 Posts |
Edited by monika 09/20/2012 12:37 am
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I don't think that's a die clash. It has something to do with a worn out die. A pro will have to chime in though. John1 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1943 Posts |
I agree. The overuse of the dies caused the obverse design to transfer into the fields on the reverse. I think this was common in the 50's.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
808 Posts |
 Yuppers...thats what it be
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
746 Posts |
Wow...I still got a lot to learn....I was sure this is a clash... Thanks guys :)
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1943 Posts |
The difference is a die clash has a sharp defined edge where this type of die design transfer (I don't like the term wear in this case) gives a blury ghost-like image.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
746 Posts |
Oh I see..  .Thank you for the explanation Pyrbob.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3640 Posts |
Well, the obv. image got transferred to the rev. die somehow. Whether blurry, not well defined or not. Looks to be in normal alignment also. If not a die clash then I would also like to know what happened here and what one would call it. It also seems to be completely under the reverse devices.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Heavy Design Transfer Quote: A die that was damaged due to repeated and lengthy use to strike coins which results in the vague outline of the central design element of the opposing die being transferred to the other die through the planchets as they are struck.
source: The Official Price Guide to Mint Errors 7th Ed.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
746 Posts |
Would that be considert a error?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
No, it is just another form of die wear.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,820 |
|