| Author |
Replies: 5,069 / Views: 378,591 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
4628 Posts |
Not bad, very shiny, rather similar to mine. My 2 arrived today, the Florin has a real brownish tone to it that is really nice. The 1935 Halfcrown has a really brand new appearance which is great.
I have managed to upgrade all my KGVI halfcrowns to 1948 (Not that concerned about 1949 to 1951 at this stage) and intend to do the same with the KGV ones. So far 1935, 32, 31, 29(2), 27, 23 and 21 are all gVF shiners or better and I now have the 2 types of 1920 coming.
Yes there was the big head and small head of that year.
And with the sterling silver Georgies, 1912, 15, 16, 18 and 19 are all gVF or EF shiners. The 1912 is AU!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
1942 UK. ½ Crown - George VI 1st type.  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
192314 Posts |
Quote: 1942 UK. ½ Crown - George VI 1st type. Fantastic! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
4628 Posts |
Yes good EF/Near EF condition, shiny KGVI halfcrowns are always beautiful and unlike earlier silver masterpieces, affordable and attractive additions to any collection.  My 1942 Halfcrown - almost UNC (Between AU and UNC) I will some have some more coins by the end of this week!
Edited by Princetane 03/28/2022 7:36 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
698 Posts |
Sorry guys having issues with pictures here lols
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
698 Posts |
Couple of Queen Elizabeth II 1953 plastic set coins the Florin and the half crown Both as struck and I have no chance to show the coins in any resemblance as to what they look like in the hand such is the notoriously weak strike . There seems to be a difference of opinion as to which varieties are the scarcest and which varieties are correctly described. The halfcrown D2311 is rated as more common than D2310 yet the dealers prices are 5-6 times higher for the D2311. Possible printing error I think. The florin has also two varieties and again my coin doesn't fit either. I of ELIZ to Gap I of DEI and to tooth(correctly to left of a tooth) And I of ELIZ to tooth and I of DEI to gap. As you can see the I of ELIZ is Right of the border tooth and the I of DEI is directly at the Border tooth. The later you could split hairs but I would surrender to that description But the former Is neither to the tooth or to the gap. On the illustrated pictures you can clearly see the two variety types markers . I believe this is a sub variety 1*+A or 2*+A . Personally I would take the later only because it is over the tooth first   
Edited by zookeeperz 03/29/2022 06:07 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
1932 UK. ½ Crown - George V 4th type.  - 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
192314 Posts |
Lovely additions! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
4628 Posts |
Zookeeperz, I agree and I have those coins too. The misty finish along with the very flat effigy of the Queen almost makes those UNC coins look VF. I am saving up for a proof set myself. They are so mediocre I actually have standard circulation examples in F/VF that look better than them! Here is my latest purchase, a couple of Fine or so 1920 Halfcrowns. Apparently there was a "Big Head" and "Small Head" effigy on them.   The horrendously cleaned one is the Small Head and the more "natural" looking coin is the large head. The small head is marginally more scarce but neither are rare or even uncommon. 1920 was a big mintage year of 17.3 million coins and a big push to rush out base silver coins to replace the sterling silver ones. The small head apparently has a higher relief and the large head less so. This meant the coins wore quicker as the small head was kept (It got smaller still with the 1925/27 modified effigy). It is part of the reason why so many early 1920s silver coins wear so quickly and badly.  The way to tell them apart is that the small head coins, the I in Dei points between the rim beads, on the large head coin, it points to a rim bead. The early 1920s seemed to be a very experimental time with British coins. These 1920 pieces are the first alloy which was 50% silver, 40% copper and 10% nickel as a whitener, it would only last until 1922.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
192314 Posts |
Quote: Here is my latest purchase, a couple of Fine or so 1920 Halfcrowns. Apparently there was a "Big Head" and "Small Head" effigy on them. Nice pair!  Quote: The way to tell them apart is that the small head coins, the I in Dei points between the rim beads, on the large head coin, it points to a rim bead. Very interesting. Thank you for the description and photo.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
4628 Posts |
Thanks, part of the fun of collecting half crowns is learning about and getting the varieties, especially the affordable ones.
Luckily for me the existing 1920 halfcrown I had was a Small Head one and this coin is an uncleaned one in similar condition to my large head coin!
I have bought some more coins and will show them soon.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
192314 Posts |
Quote: I have bought some more coins and will show them soon. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
4628 Posts |
The new coins (And looking at this, you may think my most poorly used adjective ever!  ).   1846 Halfcrown - Fair2  (American Fair, not British Fair!), I probably overpaid for this, but needed it as a spacefiller for my 1840s halfcrowns ( I only need 1839 - 41 and 1848). In reality most early Victorian halfcrowns look like this as none were issued between 1850 and 1874, except a couple of proofs. I mean many of my Regency (1816 - 1837) Halfcrowns are much better than my pre 1850 Victorian ones and even my Stuart and Georgians are nicer, still its an 1846 halfcrown and I love the naive placing of the 6 (The quality of striking in the 1840s the era of Dickens, Corn Laws and Chartism was dreadful). Finally there is a chance this poor coin ended up here in our frontier period and thus really took a beating. If coins could talk, this would outdo Obama's biographies for months! But yeah as far as my Halfcrowns go, this is down there with my apalling 1817 Bull head coin and 1821 George IV ghost coin. Its not all gleaming cream in my collection.
Edited by Princetane 04/04/2022 12:34 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
4628 Posts |
The other 3 are 3 decent shillings in the fine/near fine region. All 3 are dates I don't have and have potential to be upgraded at some stage. Again its that 1890s/1900s period I love.   1898 Shilling, Old Head - the reverse is easily Fine, however the Queen is looking a bit flat (VG)   1904 Shilling, Edward - easily the star of the group, this is a full Fine and maybe even a goodFine.   1907 - opposite to 1898 - The Obverse is a full fine, the Reverse a less convincing near fine, but the rim stays free of the letters, putting it above VG, so overall a bare Fine. I am bidding on some much nicer coins - more Halfcrowns and Florins (What a surprise) 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
18138 Posts |
Great additions, Princetane! Those 1840s halfcrowns are really elusive and nearly always seem to sell for much more than the catalogue values - I was looking at ebay sold prices recently, and Fair/VG specimens were selling for more than the Coin Year Book Fine values!
|
| |
Replies: 5,069 / Views: 378,591 |