Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1932 D Washington Real Or Fake?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 51 / Views: 9,165Next Topic
Page: of 4
Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2012  10:55 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I picked this coin up this week .. at melt, because the mint mark does not look ... as good as it should. For me
I am not sure if it suffered a hit or was added.

So I am not sure if I should put it into the fake coin folder or regular 2X2 box ... any thoughts?



1932-D-Washington-Real-Or-Fake?

1932-D-Washington-Real-Or-Fake?

1932-D-Washington-Real-Or-Fake?
Edited by GR58
12/16/2012 10:55 pm
Pillar of the Community
muddler's Avatar
United States
7188 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2012  11:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add muddler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree that the mint mark looks funny. It does not seem to have the same wear as the rest of the coin. How does it look under a loop?
Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2012  11:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To me .. under the 10X loop, the top part of the D looks good but most
of the bottom part looks like a blob.

Are fake D's glued on .. would soaking in acetone take it off, if it was.

Of course there could be a chance it is real
Pillar of the Community
smokeriderdon's Avatar
United States
3755 Posts
 Posted 12/17/2012  12:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add smokeriderdon to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It could be a funky but real mm, or not. Yes, if it is an attached mm, soaking in acetone would cause it to fall off if it is attached with super glue, which is usually the case. Regardless, with a coin like that, it should be off to ANACS to make sure of its authenticity. Every 32D and S in this house has been graded to be sure. I highly recommend the same here.
Pillar of the Community
CoinsKelly's Avatar
United States
3453 Posts
 Posted 12/17/2012  06:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinsKelly to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice gamble for melt! No idea - I agree with smokeriderdon about getting it authenticated through a TPG.
New Member
CURigo's Avatar
United States
9 Posts
 Posted 12/17/2012  07:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CURigo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I really can't tell? It looks ok and funky too so I'm lost. How would a pro like a grading company know?
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 12/17/2012  10:16 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
For a coin of that value I too suggest sending to PCGS, NGC or some TPGS. Only a few dollars to loose but a lot to gain.
Might be a RPM or even a D/S or S/D.
Valued Member
Windycity's Avatar
United States
366 Posts
 Posted 12/17/2012  10:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Windycity to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hard to tell from photos but the 1932-d does have a "block-like" shape and large serifs to the left. Could be real.
Pillar of the Community
justin3651's Avatar
United States
621 Posts
 Posted 02/14/2013  01:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add justin3651 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
any updates on this?
Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 02/14/2013  06:52 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have a stack of coins that, when I get enough, I will send in to be slabbed.

I am thinking coins like this I will send to ANACS, where I just want to get a genuine and of course a grade.

I have not used ANACS, but I think they sometimes offer deals. Something like 10 coins for $100.
Pillar of the Community
Jon K's Avatar
United States
723 Posts
 Posted 06/06/2014  07:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jon K to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I just ran across this . . . . . though it is years old.
Is there an update?
I would vote that it is a Grease Filled Die and a genuine coin.
For melt? Best deal I have heard of for a while.
Would love to hear the outcome.
Pillar of the Community
solotime's Avatar
United States
2311 Posts
 Posted 06/06/2014  10:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add solotime to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
GR58 is still on CCF so don't see a reason why they can't update us?
Valued Member
giorgio11's Avatar
United States
406 Posts
 Posted 06/07/2014  07:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add giorgio11 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
A rule of thumb for the 1932-D quarter is, if it looks bad, it's good. If it looks good, it's bad. The mintmark on the genuine pieces (and your coin) often does look as though it is coming up from a depressed area in the field, so that is reassuring. I don't particularly like the look of the mintmark itself, though. It has the right shape but looks like it has two textures going on, some kind of filling. I think it's a 50:50 shot genuine at this point. On one particular 1932-D reverse die there are three strong die polishing lines in the field between the mintmark and QUARTER. That might help but is absence is inconclusive either way.

Best Regards,

George
Pillar of the Community
rupester's Avatar
United States
1300 Posts
 Posted 06/13/2014  04:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rupester to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It looks legit to me... Thats the correct size and shape..heres a i,age of my junk silver box 32 d I found.. The mint mark is correct for the wear..believe its showing its circulation and wear.. This is my opinion.. I give it a very enthusiastic nice find..my coin image should look familiar

1932-D-Washington-Real-Or-Fake?
Edited by rupester
06/13/2014 04:11 am
Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 07/28/2015  3:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I looked at the date this post started ...
and have to say I am very slow ...

But I always think coin collecting is a hobby where
you should take your time.

Anyways ....

This coin was sent into ANACS. The results were posted today.

Anyone care to take a guess what the results are?

Real?
Fake?
Grade?
Problems?
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187881 Posts
  Previous TopicReplies: 51 / Views: 9,165Next Topic
Page: of 4

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums