Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1888 V Nickel, Proof Or Not?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 2,685Next Topic
Page: of 2
New Member

United States
30 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  1:31 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add ray123 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This was in a 2x2 graded as PF63. It was part of a larger lot so I didn't pay too much for it (unless it turns out to be fake). I am not sure if this is even a proof or not. What would you grade this? Thanks.



1888-V-Nickel,-Proof-Or-Not?

1888-V-Nickel,-Proof-Or-Not?
Edited by ray123
12/29/2012 1:48 pm
Pillar of the Community
muddler's Avatar
United States
7194 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  2:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add muddler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The coin does have somewhat of a cameo look to it but additional photos outside of the 2x2 would be needed for us to speculate as to it being proof or not.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15469 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  4:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm (maybe) seeing some visual evidence of cameo on the portraits ... and the strike appears to be bold enough to qualify as a proof.

For us to offer an informed opinion we need in-focus true color photographs of the coin out of the 2x2.

David
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Pillar of the Community
hesgut's Avatar
1028 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  4:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hesgut to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Liberty nickels can be a bit tough to discern whether or not they are proof or business. I just recently dealt with this same issue on an 1899 and have handled many high grade V-nickels. My opinion on this piece is multi-faceted.

Although I am looking at a picture through plastic I think that this coin does have the characteristics of being a proof. Unfortunately, this particular coin would be worth more in this condition as a business strike than a proof.

There is an additional problem. Many of the really good fakes of Liberty nickels actually look more like proofs (in luster) than business strikes. This coin has me slightly worried. It may just be some distortion from the plastic, but some areas of the metal fields flow in ways I'm not liking. Also, the proof Liberty nickels were more consistent in their strike than business. Some areas of that reverse in the motto and wreath look a bit too soft to me.

I said "slightly worried" because if I'm put on the spot I would call the coin true and probably give it a PF-64, but it might be worth getting it certified.
Edited by hesgut
12/29/2012 4:48 pm
Pillar of the Community
dsfreeworld's Avatar
United States
4337 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  5:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dsfreeworld to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
i'd like to see it out of the mylar with good lighting...
Rest in Peace
dave700x's Avatar
United States
10625 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  7:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree, we need to see pictures out side of the flip.
Pillar of the Community
rachums107's Avatar
United States
3345 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  9:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rachums107 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Pillar of the Community
D0ubl3Eagle's Avatar
United States
5854 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  9:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add D0ubl3Eagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The coin looks like a proof but something about the graininess of the surfaces is giving me pause and it is not the frosting that I am talking about. As already mentioned by hesgut, the strike seems a bit soft in areas. So I am not sure what to say.
Pillar of the Community
dsfreeworld's Avatar
United States
4337 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  9:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dsfreeworld to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I want to compare to a Chinese counterfeit I have but I want to see out of flip for accurate comparison...buying certain type Chinese made are great to make sure you don't a pick a loser off the bay raw
New Member
United States
30 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  9:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ray123 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Here is a link to high res photos. Hope these help:
http://ray1234.smugmug.com/Other/vn...13329_GKQhQ9
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  10:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The lack of sharpness on the devices coupled with odd flat spots in the hair and an upper lip that appears to be floating in mid-air gives me doubts regarding authenticity.
Valued Member
Tom B's Avatar
United States
168 Posts
 Posted 12/29/2012  10:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Tom B to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think it is counterfeit.
Rest in Peace
dave700x's Avatar
United States
10625 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2012  07:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It looks like a cast counterfeit to me. The surfaces look grainy and there is missing detail in some ares of the bust and the denticles. Most notably is what appears to be sink marks in the thick areas of the date digits.
Pillar of the Community
dsfreeworld's Avatar
United States
4337 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2012  10:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dsfreeworld to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
in comparing with my chinese counterfeit I see similarities in the lips and LIBERTY that make me think this is a fake coin
New Member
United States
30 Posts
 Posted 12/31/2012  11:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ray123 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
dsfreeworld: Could you provide(post or provide a link) a couple of high resolution photos of your Chinese counterfeit coin? I like to see the similarities. Thanks.
Pillar of the Community
hesgut's Avatar
1028 Posts
 Posted 12/31/2012  2:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hesgut to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
After seeing the new images and having some time to think it over, I am going to change my previous vote (which had reservation at the time). I believe this coin is a fake. The details are simply too soft.

Here is a picture of a good cast fake of the same coin. This particular example doesn't have the proof-like appearance, but the quality of strike is similar.

1888-V-Nickel,-Proof-Or-Not?
  Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 2,685Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.44 seconds to rattle this change. Forums