Which Barber Dime Should I Use. - Page 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 27 / Views: 2,000	Page: of 2

Voshus007 Valued Member United States 442 Posts	Posted 01/13/2013 6:53 pm It has a weird tone on top of it from the last pic Report this Post to the Staff
Earle42 Bedrock of the Community United States 10047 Posts	Posted 01/13/2013 6:56 pm 1916 How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halves https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2 Report this Post to the Staff
Eklections Valued Member United States 171 Posts	Posted 01/13/2013 7:34 pm I like the 1916 best but it looks like it may have been dipped. The 1906 looks like its been cleaned but the spots are very distracting. Report this Post to the Staff
jsbruton Valued Member United States 271 Posts	Posted 01/13/2013 8:33 pm I really thought it was going to be the 1906, but now it looks to be the 1916. I think all the coins were cleaned. One good thing about the camera it don't lie. Report this Post to the Staff
1916 D Merc Valued Member United States 459 Posts	Posted 01/13/2013 8:35 pm Yes, I agree 1916 Report this Post to the Staff
RK55 Pillar of the Community United States 2189 Posts	Posted 01/13/2013 10:47 pm I would choose the 1916 also. Report this Post to the Staff
RES Valued Member United States 252 Posts	Posted 01/15/2013 4:45 pm Def the 1916. The 1906 is so bad that you should just go ahead and send it to me. :) Report this Post to the Staff
IndianGoldEagle Bedrock of the Community United States 36878 Posts	Posted 01/15/2013 4:48 pm 1916 has the best eye appeal of the pack. All have been cleaned so it boils down to which one do you like. Report this Post to the Staff
morgandude Valued Member United States 380 Posts	Posted 01/15/2013 5:24 pm 1916 Report this Post to the Staff
matthewvincent Pillar of the Community United States 3486 Posts	Posted 01/17/2013 08:39 am My favorite denomination among the Barbers. I vote the 1916 as well. There was a time in the 60s when cleaning coins with Baking Soda was widespread. Four of the six coins look as if they got that cleaning. Many tiny scratches are the clue. Of the '06 and '16 the '16 looks less "cleaned/dipped." For the time being, study all of the coins for strike. Ignore the cleaning. When you are ready to upgrade you will have the knowledge to choose wisely. For $5 each you have the opportunity to study higher grade examples without busting your pocket book. The 1916 will fill the spot until that time comes. Report this Post to the Staff
murrellington Pillar of the Community United States 3276 Posts	Posted 01/17/2013 1:21 pm To me all of them looked cleaned in some way, but from the very beginning I thought the 1916 first. It looks the most original. Report this Post to the Staff
jsbruton Valued Member United States 271 Posts	Posted 01/17/2013 1:43 pm Thank all of y'all for your help. Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 27 / Views: 2,000	Page: of 2

First Page Last 15 Replies

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: US Coins and Currency Forums Forum: US Classic and Colonial Coin Grading

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

View Last 100 New Topics

View Last 100 Active Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.29 seconds to rattle this change.