| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,084 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
459 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36746 Posts |
No, it's a 17. One is S mint the other P
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
 the shield is a give-a-way. This image (johnny54321) has been posted numerous times on this subject; 
Edited by oih82w8 01/14/2013 6:29 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
459 Posts |
Okay, well at least I get a 1917-S! I didn't even notice that  Thanks for the opinions.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3546 Posts |
Hi,
I do not have the skill set to determine this difference.
Is there any way someone could illustrate photographically where on the coin(s) exactly the point(s) where one can distinguish these features.
The current pictures I am able to see are too blurred to help me.
thanks, mdpmedia
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
459 Posts |
Quote: Is there any way someone could illustrate photographically where on the coin(s) exactly the point(s) where one can distinguish these features. Those are the seller images and the coins are in the mail, but here you go: http://www.slqcoins.us/educational.htmlAlso, there is two hair strands on the 1917 type one's as compared to the 1916 with one.
Edited by 1916 D Merc 01/14/2013 6:30 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
459 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36746 Posts |
The deep lines in both walls is the quickest way to tell. You won't see those lines on the worn 1916.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
In regards to the very informative illustration posted by oih82w8, I never could understand how the robe is "attached" to the ankle?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
459 Posts |
Quote: I never could understand how the robe is "attached" to the ankle? Still being a novice, I believe that it continues straight into the ankle versus curving like a J in the 1917s.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3546 Posts |
Quote: never could understand how the robe is "attached" to the ankle?
After looking at this issue a bit closer a side-by-side photo shot helped me visualize the differences better:  I placed two straight black lines on the opposite ends of a 'curved' indentation formation entering into the right foot of the 1916 SLQ. The black arrow is pointing to the center of this more pronounced curvature found in the 1916 SLQ. Also the small piece protruding from the '16's gown appears to be larger than the same piece coming off of the '17's gown. The description, 'attached to the ankle', could have been more appropriately named 'protruding into the Cuboid part of the foot' and exactly understood by anyone cable of performing a Google search. That's the best I can do on this part. 
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,084 |
|