| Author |
Replies: 23 / Views: 4,012 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1041 Posts |
ok I need some help working on a coin lets say a 1985 coin was supose to have the head of the queen from ralf maklouf but had the head from the 1984 queen obverce by arnold machin would that make it a mule or error
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
750 Posts |
G'day Shane, my thoughts are that it would have to be an error as the date and the monarch are both on the obverse? What sort of coin is it? (God only knows where you find these  )
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
1041 Posts |
so at the change over of a obverce design if it was mixed up and the wrong design was used would this be common and has it happend before that any one knows off hey unicor I dont even know how I find this stuff try living in my head I am noodling and dont want to look like a bad person them what you all think I am ask first I have leant that from this forum *** Edited by Staff - Please Review the rules that you agreed to when you registered. ***please watch your language
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
A 1985 die only exists with the maklouf bust as far as I know. Look at the 5 very carefully on an example if you have one to see that it hasnt been altered. It would not be considered a mule as that obverse die technically does not exist.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
1041 Posts |
this is only to have the vladimir gotswold obv not the ian droadley is that right 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
750 Posts |
Hey Shane, I don't think anyone here considers you anything but another one of us. The 2000 50c with the Royal Visit reverse is the only one to have the Gottwald image on the obverse. The 2000 Millennium 50c has the Ian Rank Broadley obverse. Does that help at all?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
1041 Posts |
no because they are both royal visit coin in the picture so that is not meant to be I take it it would be a error or a mule if this were both royal visit coins
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
The IRB is so much better than the gottwald obverse!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
750 Posts |
 Enworb, I think the Gottwald one is a little unflattering. Shane I think it would be a mule if you had a Millennium reverse 50c with the Gottwald queen you've pictured.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
The definitive 1984 dollar with the Machin bust is a one year type.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
1041 Posts |
no I only have 2 royal visits with 2 differant obverce so was the irb obverce meant to be on the royal visit if not that would be a mule yes I cant work it out one a mule anouther not a mule I just want to dicover a mule I found a cab on a 1960 half penny today mybe that is my discovery for the day *** Edited by Staff - Please Review the rules that you agreed to when you registered. ***please watch your language
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
The two coins you showed in the photo both have the gottswald obverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
1041 Posts |
one on the left is irb and the one on the righ is goltwald going by the mcdonald book
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
They are both the gottwald obverse. The IRB obverse is the current one we use and looks a little different.
Edited by enworb 03/02/2013 08:03 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
750 Posts |
Edited by The Unicorn 03/02/2013 08:59 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
1041 Posts |
i get it now thanks unicorn well I think I discoverd a new type there must have been 2 goltwald head designs used on the royal visit 50c coin as the 2 crowns in the picture are not the same or am I seeing things in 2000 milleniums coin was the first odverce head of irb and that head was not used on the 2000 royal visit so mcdonald book says so there must be 2 designs for the royal visit by goltswald those crowns are not the same or maybe 3 types as the mcdonald book picture has the crown from the left picture on the head of the right picture I think in the left picture it looks like a crown in the right picture it looks like a tiara much smaller crown
|
| |
Replies: 23 / Views: 4,012 |