| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,274 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
Edited by supgog
03/18/2013 4:01 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
Think she is AU 58, too much on the fields of both sides, she would be a 62 if the reverse had nothing in the fields
|
|
Valued Member
United States
79 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36744 Posts |
Don't see any wear so it appears to be MS. Real baggy so I'd give this one an MS-61.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
362 Posts |
AU58 for me also, just too many gouges on the obverse. This is definitely better than my 85 but less than my 85 O. If you find that you don't like it anymore, PM me.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3276 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
the pics are way too macro for me to decipher the surface luster, if any is present. She looks like she took a beating in the bag, really deep gouges there. Any chance of some easier cam shots from a smartphone or something to see it "in-hand"?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
If uncirculated I'm in at MS61 or MS62 could be the lighting in the photos it has no contrast. from what I can tell no more than AU53/55 as is.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
Sorry I don't think your reverse actually looks very good, strike is mid to strong range but there are way to many marks in the field on the reverse, most Morgan MS reverses are near flawless with a mark or two on the eagle, not in the fields, the fields show a mark where almost every opening there is in the field . The cheek is very marked and I think is probably worse in hand , and I believe the lighting is not showing the wear in the eagles breast or In the hair, they both look rounded. And it is missing a lot of the rims. This is just for learning, I am not trying to put you or this beautiful Morgan down But just the rim damage alone I think would drop it into AU
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Israel
2420 Posts |
Quote:
I am not trying to put you or this beautiful Morgan down But just the rim damage alone I think would drop it into AU I appreciate any feedback, but what seems to be the rim damage is probably just my poor cropping skill  . |
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,274 |
|
Posted 03/18/2013 6:44 pm
