| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,871 |
|
Valued Member
United States
359 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8515 Posts |
Looks like its been in an album.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
That was my guess too. If that's the coin they displayed and you bought, you might be stuck with it. If you want better, it can't hurt to ask them. I'd sure an try to get a better coin
I picked up 4 the other day in the mint boxes. I got lucky.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
In my experience, if I second guess a purchase from the beginning, It will bother me till I get rid of the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
It it were me, I would see if I could return it.
I find that proofs from this time sometimes develop that haze but I think there will be examples out there that you without it that you would enjoy. Just my 2 cents.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
359 Posts |
I contacted Littleton and am awaiting their reply. To answer the question, there was not a picture of a specific coin. It was advertised as a PF-63 condition coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
899 Posts |
Actually - it is as advertised then IMO... they knew they weren't listing perfect coins - hence the nice price.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
359 Posts |
I guess I should note my thoughts about the coin itself: I love the design! It's a beautiful coin to add to my collection. Whether I end up keeping this one or getting a replacement, it will permanently fill a hole in the half dollar commemorative section of my US Type collection.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
359 Posts |
Quote: Actually - it is as advertised then IMO... they knew they weren't listing perfect coins - hence the nice price. That's why I'm torn. PF-63 could be assigned to a coin with worse issues (surface hazes or scratches). That's why I'm debating just keeping the thing as is...
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187862 Posts |
I would keep it. When it is in the album, you will not see the toning on the edge. As you have mentioned, you do not want to luck into something worse. For example, no toning, but a nice rim ding or field hit. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
359 Posts |
Good point, jbuck.
I'm no expert on tarnish....er... "toning", but once it starts, does that mean it will have a tendency to "spread" over time? I really don't care too much about the edge, but moreso about the tan-brown hue that's starting on the reverse of the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
Is it toning I see on the obverse or haze? To me it looks like haze. Personally, I find toning OK but really avoid haze, for some reason it bothers me. I am referring to the planchet haze that develops on some of the commemoratives from that time period.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
If it's just haze a quick dip will fix it.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
359 Posts |
On the obverse I think it's just a bad reflection of sunlight into my camera lens... There's really no discoloring on the obverse.
The brownish hue is creeping over the "ED STATES OF A" part of the reverse and can sorta be seen in picture #5.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187862 Posts |
Quote: I'm no expert on tarnish....er... "toning", but once it starts, does that mean it will have a tendency to "spread" over time? It should be okay if you keep it in a safe environment (inside a clean building, stable temperature, low humidity).
|
|
Valued Member
United States
455 Posts |
I just received the same coin from Littleton as well and mine has the exact same issues  Chances are if you request another one, it will be the same (since we both got the same coin). Although I'd prefer for it to not have the black on the rim, I still paid less than the silver value of it so I'm going to keep it.
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,871 |