| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,811 |
|
|
New Member
Australia
27 Posts |
Hello, I was wondering if some one could please tell me if theis coin is the 2000 $1 Mule? i found this in my change today. kind regards Brad 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1005 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1041 Posts |
hey brad cay you take a better picture its hard to see I can see what you are thinking will need a better photo
|
|
New Member
 Australia
27 Posts |
Hello and thank you for your help, I was told that the Mule $1 had a smaller queens head, I think this does, any help would be great :-)  
|
|
New Member
 Australia
27 Posts |
Hello again, I have taken a better picture, sorry for the others, I dont have the best cam 
|
|
New Member
 Australia
27 Posts |
My Wife has just noticed the thickness of the coin is definitely thicker only where the double rim is present, we had a normal $1 coin from the year 2000 to go by, hope this helps
|
|
New Member
 Australia
27 Posts |
sorry for all the messages, but here is a side angle 
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
90 Posts |
Quote: Hello and thank you for your help, I was told that the Mule $1 had a smaller queens head, I think this does, any help would be great :-)
And can be measured. The coin you have imaged appears to be a slight off centre strike 2000 $1. Measure with a Dial Caliper and compare with 10c Obverse. From tip of Crown to base of neck. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1041 Posts |
pubbrab don't be sorry you will never solve it if you don't ask the feeling is cool to think you mite have one
|
|
New Member
 Australia
27 Posts |
Thank you Shanew, and thank Ford perfect, your right, it would be grat to find one, I hoped this was :-)
|
|
New Member
 Australia
27 Posts |
so both of these 2 coins are from the year 2000, the left one is normal, the right one is this so called slight off centre strike 2000 $1, can I please ask, why would the off centre strike be a thicker coin than the normal? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
Its possible that it has been though a dryer which often makes coins thicker than normal. It definitely not a mule though.
|
|
CCF Sponsor
Australia
9 Posts |
Hi Brad,
I was lucky enough to find a mule in my change about 5 years ago. The coin pictured could possible be a mule. It does have a double rim at the bottom which is a good indication aswell.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1607 Posts |
Sorry Brad, but it's not a mule, the obverse is too big as in an ordinary $1 obverse,not a 10 cent obverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
750 Posts |
Sorry pubbrad, I think it's just a misaligned strike. If you measure one line across the total coin. (using the image in paint .... the length of the line shown at the bottom right of the screen) It comes to 186. Then do a line from the top of the A in Elizabeth to the second A in Australia. It comes to 167. Divide 167 by 186 and you get .8978 A mule will be around .82 to .83 The higher resolution image you have the more accurate the measurement. eg: A normal 2000 in high res 1049/1169 giving .8973 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
750 Posts |
PS: Use a scanned image where possible so there is no angle in the image. (Or a photo from directly above). Don't worry, I've seen so many 2000's and not at mule yet.  But I haven't given up looking!
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,811 |
|