| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,779 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
I wouldn't touch either of them, but congrats I guess.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
Nice  . I don't think you will have a problem finding a new home for the 1923 s on ebay. Congrats!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
 with CoinsKelly. The 23-S will generate some interest on the bay for sure.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
Now these are examples of coins I would not crack out. Something you will almost never hear from me. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
206 Posts |
I'm curious how this was verified. Is it possible to read the date under high magnification, perhaps different lighting or lighting angles, or is there something else distinctive about a 1923 SLQ that is the giveaway? I'd be interested if anyone has any tips for dating "dateless" coins (I'm lookin' at you, shield nickles).
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
All they would need to see are faint remnants of a 3. High power magnification and lighting.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
United States
206 Posts |
Ah, I guess that makes sense! No other SLQs were minted in any other years ending with "3". Same story for the low-ball Peace dollar with the "8" in the other thread: it has to be a 1928--too bad no mint mark was identifiable.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
In the case of a 1928 Peace, having no mint mark is a good thing
|
|
Valued Member
United States
206 Posts |
Of course, the location where any mint mark would have been is so far gone, I'd think there's no way to say whether or not it was or wasn't there--quite an odd situation really!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
It doesn't appear corroded. Maybe environmental damage but even it doesn't look that bad. I guess the results weren't too bad.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2311 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,779 |
|