| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 8,441 |
|
New Member
United States
6 Posts |
Edited by alviah 07/15/2013 9:11 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
597 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
6 Posts |
Really? We really thought he had something! My brother loves metal detecting and he dug this up around an old house that's about ready to fall down. He didn't get through circulation, he had actually dug it up so we thought it might be the real thing. Well, thank you, now to tell him!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4078 Posts |
Hold on. This is interesting. The " liberty" is questionable to me with the, IBE.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
203 Posts |
I see what looks like doubling on the IBER. The 3 looks questionable though. It does look like it could be a modified 2.
|
|
New Member
 United States
6 Posts |
Thank you all. I guess we will try and get another opinion. The coin shop said that they couldn't verify if the date had been altered or not and that it was very rare for a 1943 to have been double struck. They were more concerned about the weight.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Your best bet is to try to find out which '43 DDO matches up with that doubling on LIBERTY. A counterfeiter is probably not going to reproduce a minor variety like that. Good luck!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
917 Posts |
Quote: the coin shop said he couldn't verify it because of it's weight What did it weigh?
|
|
New Member
 United States
6 Posts |
The coin dealer said it should weigh 3.11g but it weighed 3.9
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Wow 3.9 is way way over. No chance it's a copper planchet. Could be struck on a foreign planchet, you'll want to look into what other planchets went through the mint in '43 and see if anything matches up.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
If the scale is accurate, that's way off.  There's something iffy about it--we should see pictures of the whole coin, obverse and reverse.
Edited by DVCollector 07/15/2013 8:24 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
6 Posts |
I have more pics but not sure how to put them on here.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
I've taken the date from a certified 1943 bronze cent and put it against the OP's coin. It looks to me the "3" in the date is a different shape.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
In my opinion, this is a fabricated counterfeit.
Note the double rim and the weakness of the devices (especially around the wheat stalks and LIBERTY). This coupled with a weight of almost 4 grams and how the date is formed makes it nearly impossible to be genuine.
My condolences. :-(
On the "brighter side," it is a *nice* counterfeit. :-)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5822 Posts |
I noticed the 4 on the date has a serif tail that's not there on the questionable coin, the other fonts I notice in the reverse "UNITED STATE" seem to be rather crude, the 2 S's in STATE don't match up against the one shown Lincoln Cent Resource site.
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 8,441 |