| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,651 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
Wow ..great coin.. The first pic makes it look AU 58 ....and then the last 2 makes it look like a MS 62 or 63. Just the slightest touch on the eye lid from the first pic tells us a bit. Wonderful piece... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3167 Posts |
 That is a beautiful coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
A beauty no matter what she grades! I'd give it about a 2/3 shot that it comes back MS. It's just too sharp to be only an AU58, IMO.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
686 Posts |
I'd call it a 63. Nice pick up!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1554 Posts |
 Nice coin with a strong strike, gorgeous toning and appears original and untouched. I'd say it was probably close to a "first strike" piece and wouldn't hesitate in saying I.C.C.S. will give it an MS-64. Glenn 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
There is some cabinet friction where the patina has been worn down on the high points. I notice that is on one side of the coin only, so I am fairly certain that it is not from circulation wear. If it was, those high points would have been patinated over again, as suggested by the patination on the rest of the coin.
I think that there has been the tiniest amount of wear (cabinet friction or similar), on those high points.
Museums place their coins in cabinets, and so cabinet friction over the decades happens on the side of the coin on which it happens to be resting.
I think this coin makes the case that coins are better off stored in Mylar flips or non PVC Saflips. Does not matter any further for this piece, if it is headed for slabbing. One of the problems with slabbing, especially in this case, is that those high points will continue to be obvious, in an air tight environment.
They are, in fact, only a very minor point to quibble about.
AU58. Great patination, except for those high points.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
972 Posts |
Very nice original coin, exceptional strike and detail. MS63 and possible a 64. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
2495 Posts |
Thanks everyone.
I'm with glenzy, as I think it may grade a 64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9866 Posts |
Nice one! I agree with wireman.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
Just a quick question for the known experts here. 1...Would her eye lid (not the eyebrow) be sitting up higher than those highest bands of hair? The fields look wonderful,..but I (as you) can see some contact/rub on that eyelid in the 1st more shiny pic..I'm asking because "if" the eyelid is a touch lower than the hair, how would cabinet friction get to contact that eyelid? That toning is perfect and makes it look soooo antique...  . . . I've just looked at my toned 1901 10 cent coin. It's eyelid is more flat than yours and it's graded MS60 ...so yours should grade much higher ...and I was wrong in my above grading..(again  ) Pics to compare if you want..... . . . .
Edited by DEVLEC 09/22/2013 2:45 pm
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,651 |
|