| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,671 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1109 Posts |
So I have a near-complete set of Modern Commemorative Half Dollars. I am missing the 1996 swimming uncirculated, both the 1996 proof and uncirculated soccer halves, and both the 2011 proof and uncirculated US Army halves. I started the series because I got about half the set in one fell swoop so I figured I would complete it. However, I find that I am really not too interested in finishing this set. I think I will keep the silver halves and the baseball halves (I love baseball) but the rest (including the Dansco album) I am considering selling. Anyone have a) input on this, and b) any idea what the market is for these? ebay seems to have some price extremes so it's hard to get a feel for it.
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Generally ebay seems to give a premium for near complete sets. I'm a little rusty on what these go for raw but I think a couple get a nice premium and you might want to consider parting those out on their own. You could always set the price high with best offer and just see what people offer for it too. I do think youd do better as a set though, most would just end up getting lost in a sea of them on there
|
|
Valued Member
United States
461 Posts |
Most of the coins sell low by themselves. I have picked up many of the coins for less than $5 (I am nearly done with a set having 12 of the 18 now but its a mixed proof and unc set once done I may consider getting both a proof and unc set picking up the ones I am missing). You will get more as a near complete set then selling them individually. The rarer coins and the ones that command a premium are the ones you are missing like the swimming and 1996 soccer and the 2011 infantry. Most of the rest of the set is fairly common and go for very cheap. You would do better selling them as a near complete set. I have bought a lot of these the last couple of months on ebay myself.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1109 Posts |
Yeah, I was considering leaving them as a near-set. Like I said, I am keeping the silver and the baseball ones, but selling the others all together with an album should bring me a decent amount. Even the ones that sell for more than $5.00 usually can be had for under $20.00. Just taking an average for the halves I do have that I am willing to sell, and including an asking price of $15.00 for the Dansco, I think I could potentially get $200 for the near-set. My issue now is that I hate selling something I have worked to finis, so in a way I kind of want to finish it, but the last ones I need are annoyingly cost-prohibitive. It just feels like the Mint put them out to get people (like me, apparently) to grab them up at a premium, but it's like eating McDonald's; you feel satisfied at the time, but give it a little time and you'll realize it was an empty satisfaction. I'll await additional feedback and sleep on it as well, I think. Thanks for the replies so far, and I welcome additional input on the conversation.
Edited by skyshark124 10/06/2013 12:29 am
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12259 Posts |
Quote: It just feels like the Mint put them out to get people (like me, apparently) to grab them up at a premium The reason that some of the modern half-dollars command a premium is not because of any limited mintage practice by the US Mint. They carry a premium because collectors did not buy them in large quantities when they were available. The Mint would have happily sold more of them if collectors had wanted them!
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1109 Posts |
I guess I meant it more like the reason they keep making new ones every other year is to give us something to buy without thinking about things like quality or uniqueness. I completely understand why some of them are so expensive and how it's due to low mintage from lack of demand, but I guess I am not explaining this right...there's just no real "reason" for some of these modern coins, and it feels like they are just shoving something out the door to say they did it. I guess that's why I am feeling so underwhelmed by the set.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
461 Posts |
The problem with the halves is two fold one on the mints end and the other on the consumers end. These really aren't that popular of a series and everytime they offer a half they never sell that many the infantry in 2011 only sold 50,000 giving it a very low mintage so you don't see these very often. Since 1996 the mint has only released 4 commemorative halves 2001 Capitol Center, 2003 First Flight, 2008 Bald Eagle and 2011 Army. That's 4 coins in 17 years and even with the not doing them very often they still couldn't get people to buy the 2011's. There is really not that much incentive for them to make them or sell them if there is no demand for them. They heyday of this series was between 1991-1996 a span that so 11 of the 18 commemoratives halves minted and by the end the mintage was again low like the swimming half that again only had 50,000 made. These aren't like the Statehood Quarters or the national parks people never see these and only few people collect them because of that. But to me they have some beautiful designs the Bald Eagle is a gorgeous coin, plus I love the 1986 Statue of Liberty, the Columbus, the Mount Rushmore, Congressional in 1989. Its a fun set that can be done fairly cheaply. I think the mints problem is they have almost exclusively done these as clads (with the exception of Washington and the Bill of Rights). I think these would sell better and be more collected as silver. They release commemorative dollars every year several times a year and they always sell better than the halves because I think partly because they are silver. I like the set there is some nice coins in there and it looks awesome as a complete set but to each there own.
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12259 Posts |
It's important to keep in mind that the Mint only strikes commemorative coins that Congress approved and the President signed into law. They do not issue any of these coins on their own.
Also, the decision to strike a silver half-dollar vs. a clad half-dollar is not determined by the Mint. It is specified in the Public Law that authorized the coin program.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
899 Posts |
It is a question many of us have asked...why do they insist on releasing these in clad only offerings. I am guessing they are looking at the per coin savings and not the sells they would get if they sold them as silver.
I actually think this series is very collectible - but at this point - I think you need to have all the coins or you have almost none...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: That's 4 coins in 17 years and even with the not doing them very often they still couldn't get people to buy the 2011's. To me thats part of the problem. Yes if they were silver theyd probably get more interest, but its hard to sell someone on a series they will only have to work on for a single coin every 3 or 4 years. I think if congress had them come out every year they would do better than they are now. Its a very beautiful underrated series, its just that if you have a complete set already theres rarely anything to do for it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1109 Posts |
Well, after sleeping on it, I decided I should keep what I have and finish it. I have invested too much of my effort into getting it done, and I am going to see it finished! At least, that's what I think right now. :)
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,671 |
|