Quote:
Q1: Is there a general consensus as to what this does to the value? Is a PF-58 totally undesirable, while a PF-60+ is much loved?
Q1: Is there a general consensus as to what this does to the value? Is a PF-58 totally undesirable, while a PF-60+ is much loved?
Kind of depends on rarity to begin with, of course, but I would generalize that a circulated Proof will lose far less value than an Impaired one (damaged, cleaned). In the case of the specific Pops you mention, I suspect the loss of value would be somewhat linear, in a grade progression fitting the pattern formed by the lower-grade PF6x examples.
Quote:
Q2: Am I fooling myself putting a PF-58 into my "circulated" typeset?
Q2: Am I fooling myself putting a PF-58 into my "circulated" typeset?
Well, it is Circulated.
Quote:
Now there is a new typeset idea - collect the worst certified version of each coin, with the sole limit that you didn't certify it yourself or have a friend do it for you...
Now there is a new typeset idea - collect the worst certified version of each coin, with the sole limit that you didn't certify it yourself or have a friend do it for you...
Although it isn't done with Proofs, Lowball sets are already a thing for a few issues, particularly Dollars, Morgan and later. Note my avatar.





















