Opinions On This 1934-35 Centenary Florin?

There us a thread on this topic, where you may compare the finding with your coin.
https://goccf.com/t/151449

Definitely fake. A most likely chinese counterfeit looks like a perhaps cast coin. At least it wasn't as high quality as fakes struck from dies created by electrolysis? from genuine coins these are the ones to be aware of. Anyway there are a number of reasons that I found particularly the coat is not completed as seen that it comes quite short of the rim and the lack of detail cannot be justified by the wear after looking at other Very Fine coins which had just as much wear but significantly more detail. Also the weakness on the striking of the rider's hand is a notorious indicator of a fake while the weak details on the horse and king's cloak also supports it being fake.

Lastly these coins had a value of two shillings but were sold for three shillings to support the celebrations making low grade examples much much scarcer than high grade examples as people set them aside as a shilling was worth quite a bit back then

I agree entirely it is poor and who ever bought it should try and get their money back from them it is a pretty poor fake also the sporadic toning around V King and the last R of Emperor only make it more suspicious and the letters fade into the fields the closer they get to the rim meaning it was weakly struck probably from medal presses if dies were used M of Melbourne for that by the way if they are reading this I would happily offer my services as a reviewer of Australian coins if you need help anyway if a 17 year old can tell if a coin is a fake it is a pretty poor effort.