| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 2,489 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1572 Posts |
Edited by Sudz
12/19/2013 9:21 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
967 Posts |
Nice coin. Up until this year it seemed that I found 2 or 3 a month. This whole year I think that I have found just one. Don't know where they have all gone. Still Lookin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1944 Posts |
this might sound a bit picky - but that is really a variety - rather that an error.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
746 Posts |
Congrats :)
Nice coin......I found only 2 in 2 years.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1572 Posts |
still lookin: Finding 2-3 2006-P 1DO-017 DDO's per month from 2006-2012 means that you have found somewhere between 168 and 256 of these so, to answer your question, I think you have them all!  Congrats! Also, dbrablec: I am not sure of the difference, I guess. I thought all DD's were errors... no? |
|
Pillar of the Community
967 Posts |
Sudz:
I have not been looking at cents for that long. I started with nickels then went to halves and finally to cents. I do have a total of 34 that I have kept. Some were in bad shape and I did not keep them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1572 Posts |
That is impressive, nonetheless!  |
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Very nice find Sudz John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
853 Posts |
Still on a roll! Congrats, it's a nice one!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2651 Posts |
Nice find! I have found a few 2006 DDO's but not that particular one. I can see how it jumped out at you. Nicely Doubled! Doubled Dies are considered Varieties. Varieties are variations of what the design of the coin was intended to be. Errors occur to the planchet. They are caused by mechanical/human errors. Edited by Jayman931
12/19/2013 8:11 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
207 Posts |
Truly great find, Sudz! I'm happy for you.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1572 Posts |
So errors are things like Cuds, clips, strike-throughs, etc. Correct? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
80 Posts |
there are error catagories for each of the processes a coin goes through at the mint like blanking errors, upset mill errors, annealing errors, striking errors and so on depending on what coin goes through what processes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3486 Posts |
Let's hope uman2 has a sense of humor:
The technical description is, "An oopsie occurred during the minting process."
When you stop to consider just how many coins are produced the manufacturing
process is bound to create a few flawed examples.
And we collectors gladly welcome this awkward kids into our collections.
The very popular 1955 double die is really no more than an exaggerated example of these kind
of minting flaws, but having caught the imagination of folks it demands a lot of money.
uman2, you sound like you just enjoy hunting these coins, and the members will be quite helpful
in your study.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I don't consider die aging events as errors. Chips, cracks, breaks, clashes, die wear and others are events that happen to dies in normal use. I don't consider these errors. I consider errors as a one in a kind event. Errors include wrong planchet errors, incomplete planchet errors, split planchet errors, wrong stock errors, sintered planchets, broken dies, rotated dies, overpolished dies, broadstrikes, indents, brockages, and a whole host of other striking problems. When certain die aging events happen they do become collectable. Cuds, die splitting, die cracks across the full die. But it is extreme events that happen to the die that are collectable. |
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,489 |
Posted 12/19/2013 5:27 pm
