| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,354 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
What do you think? 
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
256 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18654 Posts |
obverse 20 reverse 25. I think it nets to 20
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
Net VF-20, as said the reverse is stronger. nice coin
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Yeah, I think I'm onboard with VF20. Tough call on surface originality but I lean towards "original."
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
Quote: Tough call on surface originality but I lean towards "original." i always say a water and rag wipe from 1894 is more than acceptable the obverse looks F15 for sure and the reverse is stronger but for such a common type year I would go more conservative based on the obverse and stick with F15. Also, whats that chatter starting at S2 and moving upwards? Is that a bunch of nicks along the surface?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
Reverse is mid VF, obverse is barely VF. I'll call it VF20.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1003 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1261 Posts |
The keys to look for when grading Seated coins in the F-VF range is the shield and neckline. This has a nice strong outlined shield and there is detail to the neckline and hair. I think this is a VF-25 coin. As dsfree pointed out there seems to be some chatter in the obverse fields and a pin scratch through miss liberty's midsection.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,354 |
|