| Author |
Replies: 33 / Views: 4,732 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
477 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
IF the government really wanted that coin or any coin, wouldn't they just send a few copters full of men in black outfits to just take it? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2543 Posts |
Quote: The owners of the certified 1974-P aluminum cent received no such confiscation letter, how is this any different? That being considered I think they will end up getting to keep the coin, though they may not be able to sell it at open auction. THE 1974p's were legally authorized and distributed (loaned) to select members of congress for approval. I have read that VP Joe Biden has a couple in his retirement account waiting for auction after he retires. The Mint requested them back and then proceeded to set a precedent by not actively pursuing their return and allowing them to be displayed and sold. The 1974d was never authorized or legally distributed and therefore considered (like the 1933 Gold Eagles) stolen gov't/mint property.
Edited by denco7 03/23/2014 10:40 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8518 Posts |
Get it back and put it in the National Numismatic Collection of the Smithsonian.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 13014 Posts |
Quote: The 1974d was never authorized or legally distributed and therefore considered (like the 1933 Gold Eagles) stolen gov't/mint property. That argument effectively outlaws every single error coin to ever come out of the mint. None of them were ever authorized. Theyve known about these for years but only now have the decided to say something and waste millions while costing themselves millions in revenue. In the end its just an arbitrary decision ultimately costing the tax payer. If you really want to go conspiracy theory though since its clear those with power are allowed to keep those how about the idea that some Senator or Congressmen decided they want it without having to bid on it so they made a phone call and like magic its now illegal to own something theyve known about for years. Maybe Biden wanted a full set for his retirement account?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
621 Posts |
Quote:
That argument effectively outlaws every single error coin to ever come out of the mint. None of them were ever authorized. They(errors) are officially released "legal tender" however. That's why errors are legal to own unless they are backdoor jobs that were not legally released but smuggled out. I remember reading about it when that security guard stole all the missing edge lettering dollars and they interviewed a mint official about it.
Edited by justin3651 03/24/2014 03:31 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1007 Posts |
No big deal. For a couple of dollars you can buy one from several aliexpress sellers.
Edited by matchbox 03/24/2014 9:23 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2087 Posts |
I just don't understand............Why is a gvt department even concerned about such a coin? Aren't there more important things to deal with...like the economy?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
621 Posts |
Austro, they are in their opinion reclaiming something that was not supposed to be taken from them in the first place and is still their property, it makes sense from a business policy standpoint. you have to draw the line somewhere. I wish enforcement was a little more consistent but it is what it is. I wont comment on what else they could or should be focusing on right now as politics are kind of taboo on this part of the forum. as a former mod on another site I can understand why, I've seen more threads than I care to count on the other site that have turned into spiraling out of control political arguments on us.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 13014 Posts |
Quote: taken from them in the first place and is still their property, it makes sense from a business policy standpoint. From a business policy standpoint it actually makes no sense at all. If a CEO went to his board and said he wants to spend millions of dollars reclaiming something that is not only worthless to the company but will provide millions in revenue in the future (in this case the tax through future sales) they would be fired on the spot and laughed out of the room. If they werent their stock price would plummet if they were a private business. The mint doesn't even acknowledge that these were ever made. This isn't spy tech or military hardware where denying the existence has good reasons behind it. If they wont even admit that they made it they really cant claim it was stolen. Given that they wont even admit to making it its really the same as a planchet error. Pennies arent authorized to be struck on dime planchets but it happens and theyre allowed to exit. Just claim it was a planchet error and let them have to make the case that all error coins are illegal and see how well that goes over. To make it even worse a 74 P aluminum was graded by PCGS in 05 and that one was deemed perfectly legal. I'm not a conspiracy theory person but the massive inconsistencies even with the aluminum cents themselves and I cant help but think that someone is using the government to get something they want. Nothing about this makes any sense in any way from the government or the mints perspective. To really make matters worse one of the owners had already pledged to give 100k or more of his profits to charity from the sale. So basically not only is the government wasting resources and money while costing themselves money at the same time, but theyre also hurting people who could have been helped by that substantial contribution to charities for the homeless. I stand by my initial statement that whoever made the decision to go after it should lose their job, theyre the type of government worker that gives government workers a bad name.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
621 Posts |
yes, from that point baseball It doesn't make sense. however I was referring to base company policies. for example where I work it's just as big of a deal to steal something worth a quarter as something worth much more when it comes to policy. I am having a hard time putting what I mean perfectly into words.  I'm sorry I cant be more clear.
Edited by justin3651 03/25/2014 02:58 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 13014 Posts |
I get what youre saying, I'm just saying some common sense needs to be used. If your company caught you stealing something they would fire you I assume and that would be the end of it. Not wait 40 years long after youre dead then go to your children/grandchildren and tell them they need the office supplies back that you stole 40 years ago while denying they ever purchased them in the first place and that if they dont comply theyre prepared to spend millions on legal fees to get them back.
Since they deny ever making it, they should have to prove its not just an off planchet strike or planchet error before they can even attempt to justify a claim to it.
If theyre worried about deterrence theyve already assured that theres absolutely no deterrent factor from any of this. Their inconsistent stance on the issue destroys any deterrent value since its basically a coin flip of whether or not theyll want it back, plus the fact that you can easily just enjoy it until you die and they make no effort to stop you when it happens 9 times out of 10.
Technology alone could solve the issue in the future anyway for a fraction of the cost assuming they dont already have video systems in place which they likely do.
If the guy who may have taken it was still alive theres an argument to be made, but hes not which basically just means theyre doing it to do it. The fact that the Ps are fine because senators and congressmen refused to give them back when asked while ducking federal investigations looking for them just makes it even more disgusting for the double standard being used here between the haves and have nots.
They should leave this one alone like the Ps, but if they insist on getting this one the Ps better be getting confiscated as well which of course they arent.
Edited by basebal21 03/25/2014 03:23 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8518 Posts |
Can't just let government employees pilfer stuff, especially someone that knew exactly what he was taking and what it's worth would someday be.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: The owners of the certified 1974-P aluminum cent received no such confiscation letter, how is this any different? They have never tried to sell it. if they were to put it up for auction my bet is it would be confiscated. Quote: Since they deny ever making it, they should have to prove its not just an off planchet strike or planchet error before they can even attempt to justify a claim to it. They have also said on several occasions that all of the 1933 double eagles were accounted for. That was 21 1933 double eagles ago. Quote: To make it even worse a 74 P aluminum was graded by PCGS in 05 and that one was deemed perfectly legal. No they have never said it was legal and their position on it is still that it is government property. The only thing they have said is that the people who kept them originally were not intending to steal them. Quote: Since they deny ever making it, they should have to prove its not just an off planchet strike or planchet error before they can even attempt to justify a claim to it. This I agree with. There are other off-metal coins on planchets that the Mint didn't use (planchets that most likely got mixed in with others from those supplied by outside contractors.) and they are considered legal.
|
| |
Replies: 33 / Views: 4,732 |