Possible Anders Nevalainen Silver Piece

Wait that would make it Faberge if it is 0-0? I'll start having a look :).

Ok after a brief search, even though there is lovely detail-it doesn't bare the Faberge mark, as far as I know.

The 84 is for I believe 875/1000 silver, the leaf next to it is I believe for St Petersburg 1873-1898. Now to ID the maker. OK more narrowed down date, the combined mark as featured was used between 1882-1899. Link to this info: http://www.925-1000.com/Frussia_city_01.html

Anders did work in St Petersburg around this time-frame, but was a master goldsmith.

Unfortunaetly I can't identify a positive match with regards to the maker. If you want you could put the piece on the site in the link, they help me identify marks and have a forum that should help more :).

Sorry I couldn't be of more assistance, I would conclude the dating and purity mentioned are correct. However I feel it is not Faberge, due to the lack of significant marking. However the piece is beautiful, and there is the chance I'm wrong also the fact that Anders was working in St Petersburg. Great piece, I love Russian enameled silver.

No worries, I love silver items especially with such great workmanship. Let me know what they say about it please, I'm intrigued.

It's not Anders, but is it silver? Try listing it without any name, to get some feedback on a maker. The title might lead people to believe that it was sold as an Anders piece. Because of Faberge,many other Russian silver/gold makers imitated the style. There are other Russian makers with the same initials and similar initials. I was looking into the N being a M or H.

The response received was very good, but only ruled out an Anders piece. Not mentioning other possible makers, which leads me to believe the title has lead to this response. For me the lack of the Faberge mark was why I thought it was not Anders. And with the diagram showing the Anders stamp mark(outline), your one has a unique border which hopefully someone on the site can I.D. it to a maker. The sites really good, the guy got blueprints wow! As I say, the title might be leading answers to a conclusion on a possibility. Try it with no name in the title, just to find the maker :). Glad you got a swift response.