thanks guys!
jaobler you are really smart intutitive collector
the coin is darker in person due to the alloy mixture wonderful coloration and rare as most all have been stripped and dipped
of the 10% copper and also it is really a gem coin the reverse is superb gem and the coin is deep cameo killer but it is in an proof 64 cameo pcgs holder
the c oin is deeply toned but deep cameo but the strippers and dippers or as they call in conservatikon experts woujld dsip it for the deep cameo designation
such is the coin game industry
even with the original copper speck and this reed mark I cant see whyt it would not be graded proof 65 as without the toning dot the coin would easily be proof 66 the reverse is a solid proof 66+++ if not 67 but the obverse caqrries the coin and with the proof 64 going to proof 65 this more than duobles the value of the coin so pcgs erred on the side of caution
cant blame them but they like dipped white blast white coins and they dislike take off for deeply toned coins and this is not good or bad just the wya they grade and it is all highly subjective
show ten top experts in as such coins and you will definately get a point spread difference
which is okie as since I like coins that are worth more out of their respective holders this is good as the plastic around the coin is basically worthless if not hurting the coin
better this than a coin that the plastic around it makes up the majority of the demand hence value
well I am off to bed sleepy time for me
possibly a delicious milkshake to put me to sleep
