| Author |
 Replies: 29 / Views: 4,884 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1804 Posts |
Thanks  |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1804 Posts |
Reverse Thanks   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1431 Posts |
1972-D?
It's unquestionably a PO-1
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
PO-01, very nice lowball. I'm thinking 1972-D. Would do nicely at an auction in front of the right buyers if slabbed by PCGS. Very hard to find lowball Ike's.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3229 Posts |
That is awesome!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1804 Posts |
zxcccxz............... Quote:
PO-01, very nice lowball. I'm thinking 1972-D. Would do nicely at an auction in front of the right buyers if slabbed by PCGS. Very hard to find lowball Ike's. The mint is most likely a (D) DATE, I have studied it under my best power "spy glass." results unknown. zxcccxz, would you make a guess on the value? |
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
The date and mint *must* be plain for it to grade. Might not be the winner we think.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36724 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1804 Posts |
SsupperDdave............. Always good to have you weigh in.  Quote:
The date and mint *must* be plain for it to grade. Might not be the winner we think. I could *guess* the date and mint. But, Out of fear-concern-etc., that I will make a misstatement (fib-lie-etc) ... better for me to just let the TPGers do it for me, and let the chips fall where ever. I am old, tired, and wish to maintain a good reputation here on CCF. |
|
Moderator
United States
15408 Posts |
That is a very interesting coin indeed .... While undoubtedly worn to a PO01 technical grade ... I am not convinced a TPG would certify it as such. The date and mm must be identifiable ... perhaps an Ike expert could distinguish between a 1972 and a 1973 in this condition ... but I am not able to do so. Best of wishes if you choose to send it in. David Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1804 Posts |
NickelSearcher............. First Thank you for replying. Quote:That is a very interesting coin indeed .... While undoubtedly worn to a PO01 technical grade ... I am not convinced a TPG would certify it as such. The date and MM must be identifiable ... perhaps an Ike expert could distinguish between a 1972 and a 1973 in this condition ... but I am not able to do so. Best of wishes if you choose to send it in. David (If) the coin was sent in, they would have better *tools* than my ability to post it here, on CCF. ============================== Other question.... Hypothetically speaking, ... is there any lea way for (P) Ikes which have no MM? My humble guess is they just make a grade or just return it ungraded, and that is that. All responses welcomed |
|
Pillar of the Community
968 Posts |
Might grade if you can convince them it's not a '73 or '78. Looks like a '72-D to me, and looks PO-1 for sure. I've had '72 plains come back because they couldn't identify if it was T1, T2 or T3.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Quote:
I am old, tired, and wish to maintain a good reputation here on CCF.  That can be tough to do some days! Your coin looks PO-01 but only a TPG can decide if it's an identifiable date/mm combo. If it is a 1973-D PO-01 then PCGS shows a big fat ZERO in their Pop Report for it. |
| |
Replies: 29 / Views: 4,884 |
Posted 05/18/2014 6:00 pm
