Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2 Cent Question.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 4,567Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
Australia
301 Posts
 Posted 07/11/2014  8:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add sweetap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you wwwww that is great info but still rolled or sacked new coins in 1968 were still more than 4 million more , I'm sure there's plenty hiding in old tins and bank vaults.

And as many here have said before just because there in rolls don't make them any better than a bagged coin they still get knocked around , spat out the machine landing in a stillage full of other coins scooped out for packing etc , So I still don't get where the 1968 can be rarer than 1969, It logically defies reasoning and common sense.

I still go with MRCRUISE his comment seems to me to be the more common sense answer , buyer perception if they hear see or feel a particular coin is either rare or could become rare it is snapped up. Modern day coronation $2 coin is a prime example I don't believe in long term it will be worth any more than it is now. Why because everyone has 3 mint rolls at least in there cupboard. But who knows.

My point is no matter how they left the bank mint or anywhere else fact is there is only 16 million 1968 2 cent coins and only 12 million 1969 coins no matter how you try to ASSUME that one had a better chance of remaining in MINT state that is a big call, I'm sure there are still plenty of 1968 mint coins left in old bank vaults etc , more chance of it being 1968 than 1969 simply because there were 4 million more minted in the first place.

The debate on bagged and rolled coins will always be around but at the end of the day does it really matter a mint coin is a mint coin no matter where you get it from.

Sorry guys I don't buy the mint set and bagged vs rolled theories it just makes no sense when one is more than 25% more volume produced than the other and can be called the rarest of its kind it clearly is not.

I guess Ill just have to except that maybe it is just a combination of things , maybe even though these coins were minted but may never left the mint and were recycled, I know that happens. Anyway its been good to hear all the different ideas on it. Thank you.


Pillar of the Community
wwwww's Avatar
Australia
541 Posts
 Posted 07/11/2014  9:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wwwww to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
When measuring the scarcity of a coin in mint state, rolls surfacing are far more accurate than mintages. Mintages can largely be ignored for most coins, e.g. 1917I half pennies have a mintage of over 5 million, the 1912H has a mintage of 2.4 million and yet the 1912H is 10-20x more common in higher mint state grades because mint rolls surfaced while no mint rolls of 1917I 1/2Ds surfaced.

The 1964 penny (with a mintage of 10 million) is readily available in full red mint state because hundreds of mint rolls surfaced, the 1964-Y (with a mintage of 55 million) was bagged at the mint so only bank rolls surfaced making the coin extremely rare in full red mint state.

A coin's scarcity in mint state has a far greater relation to the number and type of surfacing rolls than anything else (including the mintage figure).
Pillar of the Community
MobOfRoos's Avatar
Australia
762 Posts
 Posted 07/12/2014  04:36 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MobOfRoos to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
MobOfRoos, based on your reasoning why doesn't the 1967 2c coin attract the same attention as 1968?

More were minted, yes, but no mint set


It does. The catalog value of a 1967 2c is almost double that of the 1969 2c despite having a mintage of 73 million which is about 6x as many.

I think what people have to do is separate circulation mintages from NCLT mintages as they mean very different things.
NCLT (which mint sets basically are) are collectors items so pretty much the entire mintage will survive.
Circulation coins on the other hand go out into the public domain and over time many of them will be lost, destroyed or damaged beyond repair. This is especially the case in the 60s and 70s when decimal coins weren't seen as collectable.
Valued Member
Australia
301 Posts
 Posted 07/13/2014  08:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add sweetap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
All very interesting, So from what we have so far the 69 is believed to be less rare in high grade simply because of 30,000 mint sets and they were rolls in stead of bagged like the 68.

OK so why is every other decimal coin the low mintages are most definitely considered the hardest and most valued coins and some of those were not as low as the 69 2 cent.

Very interesting lots of varied views guess we can consider it may just be a total combination of all things mentioned , altogether it would probably make good reasoning. Thanks everyone .

Just like to mention a secret Gov memo has been circulating Canberra, They are seriously looking at ending all currency buy 2050, What are all your thoughts on this.

Do you believe it will happen.

Do you think it is right.

Do you agree with it.

How will this effect you.

What about those who don't have mobile phones and computers etc.

Is it a good idea.

My answers are.

Yes

No

No

It will have little effect on me simply because little chance of me being here still buy then, And I simply don't like authority big business and Governments who are more crooked than the black market which I believe will have zero to little effect on. Many reasons for this.

It is a simple as If your not like us we don't care so get with the times from the powers in charge. It will be devastating to the older community. Bit like trying to teach an old dog a new trick when he is just to old tired and over it all. The elderly will understand what I'm saying there. But I guess buy 2050 all us non tech oldies wont be a problem anyway.

Good Idea? well I can not answer that one simply because it will take time to know if it is a good decision or not but my feeling is there is no way this can be a good idea, I feel it is BIG HUGE step towards socialism. If this goes ahead in 50 years after that you will be left with things like 3 colour choices of garments 3 choices of food 2 types of dwellings to choose from, take one shut up and be grateful we rich fed you at all. That is what I can only see coming from such dictatorship controlling decision.

It appears Gillard and Dudd may have been chucked out but there socialist agenda has not. All I can say thank god my turn is nearly over this place will never be the same again. I feel so sorry for the future generations, they will be treated just like the Chinese Russians etc. They love there country but not there lives so why on earth follow them. Also are you all aware it was America who convinced the Chinese Gov to become Communist in 1940,s and in 1949 after strategic help from America Mao Zedong announced Communist China. Funny that we are heading in a similar direction only not to mention it was America that also pushed the Chinese to become westernised and it was the Americans who started the push for all manufacturing to be placed there. I really feel we are being had.

Sorry for my rant I guess it is a coin forum but I think its all part of it. Electronic money is a way of control and knowing what you have where you spend it and why.

We will be categorised and labelled. No doubt about it.


Edited by sweetap
07/13/2014 8:13 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 4,567Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.24 seconds to rattle this change. Forums