Wanted to know if I got this one right...thx. I've been wrong more often than not. My concern is the font of the S might be wrong, I can't be sure. Also the 9 is suspect of die wear? Maybe the S is also?
Keep in mind that mint marks are punched more than once. The normal punch for that year may have made the wider center, but without the spread of the punchings, it is not a RPM. Just a well placed deep punched mint mark. It may have flattened some from circulation, but the date would have showed the same affect. But it is the same shape for what is normal that year, just wider in the center.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use