| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,457 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
457 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
160 Posts |
I'll say MS-62. It looks pretty baggy, definitely MS, but I think most of those marks don't look as bad in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1295 Posts |
Looks MS-62 to me as well; the $40 you payed sounds like a pretty good deal.  Can't wait to see the pics from your new set-up! Edited by Rollsearcher37
11/04/2014 11:53 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
MS-62 or possibly 63 if you're lucky.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
I agree with MS-62. Quote:
Pretty soon my photos will start to look much better since I will be purchasing all the parts that Ray suggested You won't be disappointed with Ray's suggestions. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
506 Posts |
What were Ray's suggestions?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
457 Posts |
Thanks for the input guys. Funny, the dealer said MS64/65. I knew it was MS and thought 40 was a good price no matter the grade. Coinlover168: Go to the link below and read through the whole thread, lots of great tips in there! https://goccf.com/t/158182 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
That's awfully marked up, even the reverse looks pretty baggy. Not trying to be mean-spirited, but I've seen better come back as MS61, and I'd think this specimen would be fortunate to top that.
Colligo ergo sum
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36638 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
167 Posts |
MS62.
I walked Baltimore. Most of the raw Morgans there were way overpriced.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,457 |
|
Posted 11/04/2014 11:52 am
