Quote:Lets look at the strike first.
Note that the bowtie is defined all the way to viewers left, over the lapel.
There looks to be a solid demarcation between the bust and field.
The hair detail is above average for a 50's
LWC. The ear looks to be fully defined; including the top.
It looks like there is beard detail on Lincolns neck.
On the reverse we have a solid "O" in "ONE".
The "E PLU" in "E PLURIBUS UNUM" is defined, though NOT as sharp as it could be. Still above average.
All in all; a sharp strike for that date and mint mark. I would have to see it in hand to be able to determine if it was a "full details" coin.
IF there are no bag marks, nicks or other marks; or discolorations, then I see no problem with MS65/6. It might grade higher, but again, I would have to see it in hand.
Outstanding evaluation. Thanks for the explanation. It was interesting that you mentioned the "One" in One Cent on the reverse because I have another one where the front of the One was almost flat with the coin. I wondered if that was what you were referring to when inspecting that.
Would be very happy with an MS65. I will enter it into Exact Change. Thanks and thanks to the rest of you as well.