I'm still quite amazed at some of these "publication errors".
They put their names to print and judging by the later fallout,..they should be unsure of some of their descriptions,..but they still proceed blindly to publish it anyway.
They know the "specific experts" on a certain piece but for some unknown to me reason, do not consult them.
The error labeling comes out in print,..many experts immediately cut them up ..and they are then shamed into a retraction... and their "so called expertize" is dragged through the mud..again..and again.
Why not do the free consult "before" printing ...and save the later aggravation..?