| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,558 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
63 Posts |
Thinking about submitting this for a regrade, so an independent assessment would be really helpful.  
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I would say MS62 possibly 63. Is it a VAM-9A?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
63 Posts |
Yes, it appears to be a VAM-9A. It's hard to see the S in person, let alone in pictures. It's definitely there though.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Nice pick! 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Tough call. That gouge on the breast is consistent with circulation; for that reason I couldn't call the coin Mint State at all. If we call it Mint State, 63-64 would do it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
506 Posts |
MS 62 or 63. The details are not all the best the the fields...  so clean! (maybe the lighting?)
Edited by coinlover168 11/26/2014 3:44 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
I honestly wouldn't pay to encapsulate this one. Mottled gold tone indicative of past dip.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
63 Posts |
Thanks, everyone. NGC graded it at MS-64. To me it looks a bit better than that in person, but I really struggle with MS coins. After reading your comments, I'll leave it as is.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
1921-S takes a big price jump to MS65. They'd be hesitant to upgrade a 64.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Puerto Rico
778 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
Were did the MM go? I don't see it.Should be above the D & O in dollar on the reverse, Right?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,558 |
|