I've been trying to determine what degree of cleaning/hairlines cause a coin to be designated 'details'. However, there seems to be inconsistency when it comes to TPGs. It seems to involve which company is doing the grading (Does NGC give more leeway than PCGS?) and the scarcity/rarity or the coin itself.
Would you say these ideas are correct?
Here is an example from Heritage auctions. If this were a raw coin, I would surely say this is a details coin. However, there is no such designation.
Thoughts on this?
Here's the link for larger pics:
http://coins.ha.com/itm/spain/world...1448-64368.s