| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,976 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
 I apologize for the bad images. The coin is in an old fatty holder and the holder is really scratched up. I had to hold it on it's side under direct sunlight to actually get pictures that weren't half blurry. All scratches are on the slab. What do you give it and what do you think NGC gave it?
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
840 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5404 Posts |
I would guess AU 58 but MS62 is arguable on a regrade. Frequently encountered in circ , very scarce this nice ! Great coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Tough to grade this one in it's holder, a bit of a guesstimate:
MS62.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1700 Posts |
NGC would probably give it a 63.
|
|
Forum Kid
Canada
1074 Posts |
MS-63 am I right? excellent coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5417 Posts |
Thanks for all the opinions. Would appreciate some more. Will post results tomorrow.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
134 Posts |
I'll say MS62. Whatever the grade, that is a nice coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1505 Posts |
NGC gave it a MS64 maybe even a 65
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
495 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1691 Posts |
There are slight signs of wear on high points
so I doubt they would go MS.....IMHO AU-58?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
972 Posts |
Somewhere between MS60 and MS65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
A couple of you were close. Haha, not quite an MS-66, Macedon. NGC said AU-58. Which I think is really fair, an AU-58 is just a MS-63 with a touch of friction. Not like I could afford an MS-63 1872-H 10C though.... Thanks for all the replies. This one fills one of the last spots in my date set. Just got the 1875-H, 1884, 1889, and 1892 left now.  Edited by zxcccxz
12/05/2014 10:29 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1700 Posts |
When we hear the company NGC we automatically assume a high grading.
If the pictures had been a bit more clear (so that the signs of circulation could be seen), it would have been an obvious 58.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,976 |
Posted 12/04/2014 4:17 pm
