Yes,1886 is about the closest if we look at the shape left over.
If I look under the microscope the defacement it is definitely a strike error
since there is no wear visible other then normal scratches from circulation.
Chopmarks : Wouldn't that be great,if someone would start a serious reserch
for all those unknown chopmarks....
If I look under the microscope the defacement it is definitely a strike error
since there is no wear visible other then normal scratches from circulation.
Chopmarks : Wouldn't that be great,if someone would start a serious reserch
for all those unknown chopmarks....






















