| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,850 |
|
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts |
I figured I'd put these two in the same post. From the same safety deposit box adventure. Here's 1848:  (So it seems the back of the 1848 was defaced by someone to read something vulgar -- so that pic is gone. So much for grading that one, but try the 1853!) And here's 1853:   Thanks! Edited by jakesis
01/13/2015 8:12 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
you might want to remove the first one quick, its damaged so the e in cent looks like a different letter to make something else. just saying ya might wanna take it down since this is a family friendly site and I don't want you to get in trouble.
Feel free to call me Will.
Edited by thedollarman
01/13/2015 7:57 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
The 1848 is cull. Harshly cleaned and defaced. The 1853 on the other hand is an EF-40 N-23. Nice coin.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
143 Posts |
Um, I admit I misread the coin as well when I looked at it earlier today, but it's a coin, it's not Charlie Hebdo. It's been sitting in my safety deposit box for 35 years. You folks don't permit coins to be graded that are damaged and inadvertently look like bad words? I'm having a difficult time believing that's an actual rule here, but if a moderator tells me to delete the coin, I will, as it's their site.
Wait, are you saying someone did that to the coin on purpose? An elderly family friend sold me the thing in the late 70s. I was around 15 years old. If it was done intentionally, I suspect it wasn't him.
Edited by jakesis
01/13/2015 8:03 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
actually these large cents were purposely defaced to look like that fairly often, I'm not trying to get on your bad side with my post. I just wanted to let you know incase you didn't and also since this is a family friendly site, its nothing personal.
Feel free to call me Will.
Edited by thedollarman
01/13/2015 8:08 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts |
Really? Wow, that's bizarre and obnoxious. I can't believe the old guy didn't see it when he sold it to me! (And he really was a family friend, there's NO WAY he did this on purpose. In that case, I'll take it down. I just figured it was an error in the coin or something, and thought of asking about it in my post, but then thought I was nuts that I thought it said that! No prob, I'll remove it. Sorry I doubted you ;-)
Edited by jakesis
01/13/2015 8:15 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1388 Posts |
The people that do that to large cents and Half Cents are probably related to the creators of "potty" Trade dollars. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
just for the record you could possibly get $15 or so for the 1848 as a curiosity piece.
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
245 Posts |
The 53 is tricky, is that edge wear normal on the reverse? Would say VF25 but still learning on EAC
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
I would venture VF-30. reverse holds it back.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
VF-25/30 on the 1853. Nice looking coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
952 Posts |
Vf-30 on the '53.........and I got a kick out of reading what was on the '48, amazing what people will go through to try to raise an eyebrow or two.
The '53 is a really nice coin IMO.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts |
It's been a long time since I collected coins (I only recently decided it was time to open my time-vault (also known as my safety deposit box) and take a look at what I had bought 35 years ago. The thnig is, I hear that it's a VF-30 and I almost feel disappointed that it's not higher. In what sense is it a really nice coin? I guess I keep thinking there must be a lot of coins that rate higher -- or is that not the case, that there really aren't that many, from that era, or that particularly coin, that rank a lot higher?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
Quote:
The thnig is, I hear that it's a VF-30 and I almost feel disappointed that it's not higher. In what sense is it a really nice coin? I guess I keep thinking there must be a lot of coins that rate higher -- or is that not the case, that there really aren't that many, from that era, or that particularly coin, that rank a lot higher? It is more or less just a solid collector coin that doesn't have any major condition issues and has better eye appeal than most circulated 1853s. It is not especially high grade or value but is something that a middle class collector could find joy in obtaining and plugging into their type set. |
|
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts |
Ah ok, good point. Fair enough. I did notice, for my tastes, that it seemed in awfully good shape for its age. I mean, I still love my 1802 large cent, just because of the history of it being so old.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3162 Posts |
1853 is a pretty nice one vf 35 ish
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,850 |
Posted 01/13/2015 8:00 pm
