Shale,
I like the 1911 - nice color and minimum marks - a 'no-question' very good.
By contrast, the 1902 is an ordinary very good 'with problems.'
The reverse dentils suggest a VG but the rough wear and bumps detract.
The 1909 is a VF++ with MAJOR distracting problems.
Aesthetically I would take the 1911 without a second thought.
It would also serve as a guide to further study other halves which might be either good or fine.
Note: I tend to under grade since by modern 'market' standards.
I like the 1911 - nice color and minimum marks - a 'no-question' very good.
By contrast, the 1902 is an ordinary very good 'with problems.'
The reverse dentils suggest a VG but the rough wear and bumps detract.
The 1909 is a VF++ with MAJOR distracting problems.
Aesthetically I would take the 1911 without a second thought.
It would also serve as a guide to further study other halves which might be either good or fine.
Note: I tend to under grade since by modern 'market' standards.





















