| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,081 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
73 Posts |
I was on the grading standards page, still getting used to the descriptions, but I'm assuming this falls between VG & VF?   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Adjectival grading terms in improving conditions: G (good) VG (very good) F (fine) VF (very fine) EF (extremely fine) Unc (unculated  uncirculated) - common point = MS60 This coin between G and VG (adjectival) 'F' in the British adjectival system is a better grade than 'F' in Sheldon Edited by sel_69l
02/25/2015 11:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
VG details, environmental damage. Possibly cleaned?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
VG details, corroded, cleaned.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
Corroded. Will not grade with TPG. Otherwise VG. Edited by jimbucks
02/26/2015 02:45 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18706 Posts |
The coin would not receive a grade from a TPG. It exhibits signs of being in the ground and cleaned. A details grade would be assigned when there is damage that would have occurred outside of the mint but not severe enough to not grade it...due to the severity of the damage I don't think they would assign a details grade |
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
ANACS would.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3234 Posts |
Great date, but that coin definitely falls into the Ugly Scale. I wish I could find that post with the various scale ratings that was done here some years ago.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36845 Posts |
VF details, environmental damage
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,081 |
|
Posted 02/25/2015 11:11 pm
