Well, with extra thickness and dates 5 years apart, it's certainly not an official mint error. By my reckoning, it's either:
(a) a split'n'splice job, with the join between the two half-coins cleverly concealed by mechanism unknown; perhaps the seam is hidden just inside the beaded rim on one side or the other, but I can't see it on the pics.
(b) a fake cast coin, made with two reverses; the video seems to show a slight central bulge, which lends itself to this theory. It would be a lot of trouble to make a fake double-sided penny in this way, but a trickster might find such a coin more useful than a splicer. If this is true, there should be the remnants of the casting sprue somewhere around the rim; tell-tale file marks in one spot would be evident.
(a) a split'n'splice job, with the join between the two half-coins cleverly concealed by mechanism unknown; perhaps the seam is hidden just inside the beaded rim on one side or the other, but I can't see it on the pics.
(b) a fake cast coin, made with two reverses; the video seems to show a slight central bulge, which lends itself to this theory. It would be a lot of trouble to make a fake double-sided penny in this way, but a trickster might find such a coin more useful than a splicer. If this is true, there should be the remnants of the casting sprue somewhere around the rim; tell-tale file marks in one spot would be evident.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis






















